in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 07-31-2009 6:11 AM by david coyne. 21 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (22 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-17-2009 7:17 PM

    DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    I'm planning to get a DACMagic to connect with my Macbook Pro.

    But looking at the photo of the DACMagic there is no volume control. So does that mean I can and need to control the volume from my laptop? I'm planning to plug Beolab3 directly to the DACMagic. And is the best connection I should use between laptop and DACMagic is USB?

     

    Thanks.

    Filed under:
  • 07-18-2009 1:54 AM In reply to

    • Alex
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Bath & Cardiff, UK
    • Posts 2,990
    • Bronze Member

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    You would take a digital output from the headphones-connection of your MacBook Pro using a TOSlink to mini TOSlink cable, and connect this into the optical input of the DacMagic.

    As for controlling the volume, this wouldn't be done on the Mac, as the Mac's volume control is disabled when the digital output is used.

    You have two choices here, one is to opt-out of the DAC route and go for a seperate sound-interface which will take up a USB or Firewire port on your computer, and the other option is to go for a hifi pre-amp.

    Without wanting to undermine Soundproof's advice, I would personally opt for the sound-interface, and go for an Apogee Duet. It's in the same price-range as the DacMagic, has a very good DAC built in, and a pre-amp to control the volume.

     Weekly top artists:                   

  • 07-18-2009 4:37 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    deleted

  • 07-18-2009 6:26 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    No problems there, Alex, there are several good DACs on the market.

    A couple of points, though. The DacMagic does accept both toslink optical spdif and USB from the MacBook Pro. I've had the opportunity to try a Duet, and that's another excellent option.

    More importantly - as to volume control.
    It's QuickTime which controls playback on a Mac, iTunes is a music organizer with a control interface, but it is QT which does the actual playing.
    In earlier implementations of QuickTime, you had to keep the volume at maximum in order to avoid degradation of the signal. If you reduced the volume, then you would be processing the signal inside the computer.

    Starting with Quicktime 7, this problem was solved. As Benchmark (another manufacturer of an excellent DAC) say:

    The volume controls in iTunes versions 7.X and 8.X will not cause significant distortion. The user should not hesitate to use the volume control in iTunes v7.x and 8.X
    http://extra.benchmarkmedia.com/wiki/index.php/ITunes-QuickTime_for_Mac_-_Setup_Guide

    I control the volume using my iPod Touch or iPhone. For background listening, I even use volume equalization of random playback, to avoid the volume jumping up and down between different recordings (set in iTunes preferences).
    For in-depth listening when I'm in the sweetspot, I disable that function, of course.

    A tip when it comes to the on-screen volume bar on your Mac, you can set that in smaller steps:

    Press Shift+Option and you will find that each white square in the volume bar gets subdivisions, allowing for a more precise setting, particularly valuable with the BL3s connected. You don't have that option from the iPod Touch/iPhone, though.


  • 07-18-2009 9:58 AM In reply to

    • darren
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-28-2007
    • Netherlands
    • Posts 164
    • Bronze Member

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Ooooo, nice tip on the volume control. Never knew you could do that.

  • 07-18-2009 10:20 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    what about jitter with a usb dac's?

  • 07-18-2009 11:35 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Matthew Bramble, the technical director of Cambridge, had a comment to Stereophile's rave review of the DacMagic concerning jitter.

    He commented that there's a significant difference between using the battery and the power supply - but the DacMagic's jitter suppression is able to handle both.

    Jitter is a strange issue - a Letter to the Editor of The Absolute Sound made a fun analogy, as there are audiophile reviewers who claim to hear incredibly small changes in jitter, one had claimed he could notice a difference of 7 picoseconds' jitter. In ordinary digital circuitry (the kind you get from a plastic cd-player) jitter is down well under the 300picosecond level, and often down to where we can't measure it at all. The analogy was that if one said the distance around the Equator represented a second, 7 picoseconds of jitter represented less than half a millimetre ...


    In the most recent issue of TAS, one of the writers has turned against USB, finding that spdif is better (Google Alan Taffel and The Absolute Sound and USB) -- that caused a lot of comment on the internet, and the writer had to retract some of his findings. The truth is that there's a lot of confusion as to which format is better, and that this confusion is due to psychoacoustics and wishful thinking. The audio industry is desperately looking for a way to make money in the digital age - it had a cushy time of it splitting up the signal path from source to loudspeakers through a lot of components and interconnects. Today you can send a digital signal straight into BL5s or Meridian's speakers, and you won't need all those boxes.
    So enter jitter - a problem you can measure, but really can't hear (I swear - it's a boondoggle). It's still a problem that some are willing to spend fortunes on though, on external clocks, jitter suppression circuitry, etc.

    To illustrate the degree of confusion. Positive Feedback Online asked ten industry lights about the best strategies for getting the best digital audio. All ten companies answered the same questions. If you have the time and patience, you should read all the responses (look at the bottom for the others). You won't become any wiser, as there's no industry-wide agreement on anything, but you'll relax!

    http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue41/ca_hansen.htm

    I will however say that it appears that Apple can have better power supply units, and that one could consider getting a better one, which doesn't introduce noise. The charts that Cambridge Audio Supplied to Stereophile have caused quite a bit of discussion. See below.

     


  • 07-18-2009 5:42 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    So if I go down the route of DACmagic. Any recommendation for the volume control interface then? i.e. any particular brand/model? And any recommended retailer in surrey or online for DACmagic? Thanks for the advice so far!

  • 07-18-2009 6:03 PM In reply to

    • RobN
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 05-15-2007
    • London, UK
    • Posts 57
    • Gold Member

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Hi Wowmix,

    I've recently bought a DACmagic and found the use of fibre optic TOSlink cable to be superior to the USB. USB definitely lost some of the clarity particularly the bass. You can get a TOSlink to mini-TOSlink on the web fairly easily but on the high street it proves a bit tougher. Thanks Apple for putting the optical output on as well as analog, a really nice feature Smile Maplin sell a cheap TOSlink cable with an adapter which works okay but the quality felt a bit iffy so I opted for an IXOS cable.

    I primarily use the DACmagic on with my Mac-mini to feed my B&O system via a BeoPort and the results have been truly stunning.

    However, I have also run it from a new MacBook and it also worked well, with the output being taken from the RCA jacks to a good hifi amp and Mission Speakers. I've found the best results from having iTunes and Mac on full volume into the DACmagic and then using the amp volume control.

    Full volume on Mac and iTunes also works best for the BeoPort.

    Also, make sure before quit iTunes and go into the Audio Midi Setup utility to set the 96KHz 24 bit output before restarting iTunes.

    The unit takes a few days to "burn-in" this is really the case and the sound just gets better and better over the first week, so leave it on and keep listening, the results are really very rewarding Big Smile. I can't believe more people aren't shouting about these units from the rooftops!

    Richer Sounds are the only UK dealers I know of so best to find your local dealer on http://www.richersounds.com/ 

    I hope you get one soon!

    Best

    Rob

    BV7-32, BL8000, BL2, BL6000, Humax, AppleTV3, MX4200, V8000, Humax, BS3200, BL6000, BL4000, BeoPort, MacMini+DACmagic 

  • 07-18-2009 7:14 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    I have an old Arcam Alpha 8 Integrated Amp: http://www.wired4sound.net.au/amplifiers/arcam_alpha8/arcam_alpha8.html

     

    Will this be suitable to use with DACMagic as the sound control?? Or am I better off getting the Apogee Duet to get a better sound quality?

  • 07-18-2009 8:00 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Hi Rob

     

    I also have a similar set up with DAC magic and beoport. The improvement in the sound of digital music is fantastic.

    I have had to reduce the volume to about 2/3 on itunes itself as with the volume on full a dreadful crackling sound is heard, particularly on net radio.

    Im curious as to why you can have the volume on full as in my case I cant...

    Any advice appreciated.

     

    David Coyne

    Sydney, Australia

    BV8-40, BC6-26, BC2, Beolab 9's, Beogram 7000, Beogram 9500, Beoport, Beotalk 1200, Beocom 6000, Beolit 1000, 800, 700, 600, 400

  • 07-19-2009 3:01 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Nice to see people sharing their experiences with the DacMagic. There are DACs with volume control, but they tend to be a bit steeper in price than those without, due to the design challenges of creating a transparent volume control (that doesn't degrade the sound.)

    The Arcam would probably do fine, you would be introducing an additional step in your signal chain. But why not use the volume control in the Mac, or use an iPod Touch/iPhone?

    Or - you might want to consider purchasing a used Benchmark DAC, with volume control. A number are coming on the market now, as people are upgrading to the latest version HDR with remote control.
    The early versions without remote control are excellent, and have the same interior DAC. Look for a DAC1 or DAC1 USB unit, though I agree with the poster above about the toslink connection instead of the USB. (With the optical connection, you get galvanic isolation between the computer or airport express, and the DAC - reduced chance of any ground hum or noise being transferred between the units.)
    I see Benchmark DACs going at very good prices, for used units.

    http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/

    The Apogee Duet is an elegant unit, but for your use it's actually a disadvantage that it has only Firewire. If you want to have the freedom to move your laptop around, you might want to consider transmitting your music using Airport Express connected via toslink to the DAC. You can then have your laptop wherever you want, controlling the music and working on it. And that wouldn't be possible with the Duet, as you would have to remain connected with the rather stiff Firewire cable.

  • 07-19-2009 5:19 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    http://www.ayre.com/products_detail.cfm?productid=18&field=specs

    What about this...they found a solution for the jitter problem.

  • 07-19-2009 8:11 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    This is the latest trend - to use asynchronous USB, where the computer is slaved to the DAC, and where various apodising filters are used to remove so-called pre-ringing in the digital signal.
    The manufacturers have to think of something ... Today, dCS, Wavelength and Ayre offer apodising filter solutions, as well as Meridian, which has put this in their updated CD-player, which Stereophile drooled over as delivering "the best measured performance ever."

    It's then a question of whether you can hear the added performance, or whether this is a measured benchmark that is irrelevant. And there are issues with removing pre-ringing (an artefact of anticipating the incoming digital signal), you can risk enhancing post-ringing, but that is often masked by the signal proper.

    Modern electronics have jitter-performance down to picoseconds. A picosecond is 1 TRILLIONTH of a second.

    0.000 000 000 001 seconds.

    Desperately looking for reasons to get audiophiles to spend money on digital circuits, the industry is turning jitter into a major problem, when it isn't. What is the problem? Well, you could risk your digital circuitry either not reading the 1 or 0 right - chances of that happening are non-existent with today's equipment, unless you have actual hardware failure.
    So then it's down to whether jitter can introduce timing errors in the playback of the signal - i.e. that you get good old vinyl wow and flutter, but in the digital domain, and whether this can contribute to "listening fatigue" and a sense of "digital harshness."

    So let's try to get this number in perspective. A Redbook CD-signal has 44.100 samples per second, with a data-depth of 16 bits.

    If we divide the circumference of the Earth at the Equator by 44.100, we end up with segments that are about 900 metres long. Let's say that you want each segment to be exactly the same length, and that there is something called jitter that is making this difficult. Even with the worst jitter performance shown above (with the power supply creating jitter of 2800 picoseconds), the individual segments would vary by at most a couple of millimetres. That's pretty good for something that is 900 meters long. And with jitter down to where we usually see it, in good (not extraordinary) components, the variation would be around 1/10 of a millimetre for a 900 metres long segment, of which there are 44.100 produced every second.

    If one thinks that's a significant factor affecting listening enjoyment, then do choose extravagant jitter suppression. The greatest jitter problem in audio is the nervousness of the traditional audio industry, as the consequences of the digital music shift become clear.

    The CASH page of Computeraudiophile.com is a good reference of value for money in digital audio:

    http://www.computeraudiophile.com/Computer-Audiophile-Suggested-Hardware-List

     

  • 07-19-2009 3:24 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    soundproof:
    The Arcam would probably do fine, you would be introducing an additional step in your signal chain. But why not use the volume control in the Mac, or use an iPod Touch/iPhone?

    Hi Soundproof!

    you seem to know everything about audio! When you mentioned above about using Volume Control in Mac for DACMagic. So will that work fine? I seem to understand from one of the posts that if you use DACMagic I will not be able to control the volume from Mac, that's why I put arcam into the equation...

  • 07-19-2009 3:35 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    wowmix:

    I seem to understand from one of the posts that if you use DACMagic I will not be able to control the volume from Mac, that's why I put arcam into the equation...

    The default output format for digital audio from Macs is full volume, but you can control this, either using the volume control on the Mac or using your iPod Touch or iPhone. I'm doing this right now, with playback from a Mac mini to my soundcard.

    However - I have BL5s, which make it possible for me to set a working volume for them, and I have set it so that whatever source they are fed, they do not blow out my ears or windows (which they could probably do if set at max.)

    BL3 doesn't have that option, and you therefore risk feeding them unlimited volume, and that can be a loud experience. So you either have to get into the habit of making sure that you have set the volume where you find it comfortable, before sending them a signal; or have a volume control (your Arcam or a DAC with a volume control option). I'd personally prefer not going through the Arcam, so maybe you should look for a DAC with volume control, and have that set at a level where you never risk blasting the speakers, and then just leave the volume in the Mac at max.

    If you trust yourself to always check the volume setting on the Mac before hitting play, then you're OK using a Touch or iPhone to control playback volume.

     

     

  • 07-21-2009 4:47 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    DACMagic vs Edirol UA-25EX

    How about Edirol UA-25EX by Roland. I've read the spec but I don't understand everything. The price is similar between the two. Can anyone give me a comment on these 2 please. Which will be a better companion to my MacBook?

    http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=970&ParentId=114

     

    Thanks in advance.

  • 07-24-2009 6:28 PM In reply to

    • RobN
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 05-15-2007
    • London, UK
    • Posts 57
    • Gold Member

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Hi David,

    Not sure I can offer any wisdom on why you cannot take iTunes volume above 2/3 when feeding the DACmagic without getting crackling. I read in a number of places that early versions of iTunes didn't control the volume at low settings particularly well from a quality perspective so you should always run it at full volume. I understand this was fixed from iTunes 7 onwards, but when I set up my system I thought it was logical to run a full volume so as not to risk any potential degradation through the software trying to manage the volume.

    I'm using a TOSlink cable rather than USB (as I did find a difference) are you? Perhaps there's a difference here in the way the DACmagic handles the input. Otherwise I'll leave it to others who have greater knowledge of the D to A world than me (I'm relatively new to this).

    Best,

    Rob

    BV7-32, BL8000, BL2, BL6000, Humax, AppleTV3, MX4200, V8000, Humax, BS3200, BL6000, BL4000, BeoPort, MacMini+DACmagic 

  • 07-24-2009 7:34 PM In reply to

    • Alex
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Bath & Cardiff, UK
    • Posts 2,990
    • Bronze Member

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    If you're getting crackling at some volumes but not others when using the iTunes volume control, then it's a sign that either the 'Sound Enhancer', or iTunes 'Equalizer' are on, both of which are useless RE gain structure, and usually result in crackling volume (due to clipping - the signal reaching it's maximum volume and 'flattening' off at the top).

    Always ensure the iTunes Equalizer and Sound Enhancer are switched off. Both do nothing other than introduce masses of distortion into the signal. If you really need to EQ the sound, use a good external equalizer, like the Klark-Teknik digital EQs (which are brilliant). The iTunes Sound Enhancer does nothing other than switch a portion of the signal out-of-phase and boost the bass - an absolute joke!

     Weekly top artists:                   

  • 07-24-2009 7:51 PM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    Actually, there's also a problem with the USB ports. Always use the front USB ports, the one closest to you, not the one in the rear on laptops. A number of people using USB are getting crackling and pops with the rear USB port on Macs.

  • 07-31-2009 6:09 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    HI

    Using toslink and good quality cable..so dont think that is causing the crackling. As long as itunes volume is not above 3/4 or so no crackling.

    I have no explanation as to why this is the case...

    Crackling is most prominent on N.RADIO, but occasional on N.MUSIC

     

    Any other theories?

     

    David Coyne

    Sydney, Australia

    BV8-40, BC6-26, BC2, Beolab 9's, Beogram 7000, Beogram 9500, Beoport, Beotalk 1200, Beocom 6000, Beolit 1000, 800, 700, 600, 400

  • 07-31-2009 6:11 AM In reply to

    Re: DACMagic and Macbook Pro

    All itunes options also turned off..i.e equaliser, enhancer etc....

    BV8-40, BC6-26, BC2, Beolab 9's, Beogram 7000, Beogram 9500, Beoport, Beotalk 1200, Beocom 6000, Beolit 1000, 800, 700, 600, 400

Page 1 of 1 (22 items)