I just got a BV7 32, but its currently a large paperweight with the TV's chassis needing replacement, even though its a week old, bought Brand New!!!!!
Anyway, I didnt realise but the 40 is the only version that has HDMI, for me this is important, as opposed to the larger screen because the 32 looks great and proportional in my house. 40 looks too big.
What I want to ask is what makes people choose the 40 over the 32.
- I dont care about the Cinema option
- Dont care about the stand (UP and DOWN)
- Dont really mind it not having the BS3
- 7 powerlinks is more than i will ever need, dont need that
etc etc.
Im not saying that they are useless, i just dont know if its worth that extra 2K. However, in all fairness, the 32's lack of HDMI is disgraceful. When a friend asks how many HDMI connections you have, and you reply none and then tell them that youve spend a mortgage deposit on the TV, they really do deserve to laught in your face, justifying that a DVI to HDMI converted, then a HDMI Splitter does the job, isnt really on :)
What do you guys think? What am I missing? Why 40 over 32? Is it worth waiting for this MK4, whenever, whatever it has?
Thanks in advance