in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 11-29-2007 9:57 PM by David. 11 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (12 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 11-29-2007 2:34 AM

    • David
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-05-2007
    • England
    • Posts 128
    • Bronze Member

    Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    Hi,

    I'm just about to purchase a Mac Mini to use as my media center so I can access my itunes with an itouch as described in Soundproof's detailed thread.

    Do you think I should go for a new machine with Leopard running or find a good used machine with Tiger installed?

    I have read somewhere that Leopard has a small amount of work needed.

    Cheers,

    David.

    Beolab 8000, Beolab 6000, Beolab 2, LG CX65, Beosystem 3, Beosound 9000, Beolab 3500

  • 11-29-2007 3:20 AM In reply to

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    I have Leopard in all of my Macs now, and it's working very nicely.

  • 11-29-2007 4:52 AM In reply to

    • francis
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Münster, Germany
    • Posts 108
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    Hi,

    I am using my Mac mini for a year as a media center with Tiger, and I'm are very pleased with it. Last week I bought a new iMac (which is really a brilliant piece of technology, btw). The iMac was delivered with Leopard, so I decided to upgrade the Mini also.

    The installation was no problem at all and in general Leopard is running stable on my mini. All applications run and I have not yet discovered bugs. However, the performance is markably worse as compared to Tiger. For example it takes much longer to start applications or to switch between apps. As - once the app is running - the performance is acceptable it's ok for my purpose as a media center, only playing media and not really working with large files.

    The poor performance might be due to small memory (I only have 512 MB installled)

    If I wanted to work on media files with my Mini I would not switch to Leopard unless having better hardware.

    Francis

    |BV 7-32|BL 7-1|Ouverture|BL Penta|BL 6000|BL 2000|Beocom 6000|Beotalk 1200|MX 4000|Beoport|Beo4|Beo5|A8|A9|

  • 11-29-2007 5:17 AM In reply to

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    @francis

    I'm quite certain it's your low RAM that is causing the slowdowns, Leopard does want space to move. I have 2GB in my computers, and have not noticed any slowdowns.
     

  • 11-29-2007 6:00 AM In reply to

    • David
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-05-2007
    • England
    • Posts 128
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    Thanks for the replies.I will go for a new machine then with Leopard installed.

    Beolab 8000, Beolab 6000, Beolab 2, LG CX65, Beosystem 3, Beosound 9000, Beolab 3500

  • 11-29-2007 12:23 PM In reply to

    • francis
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Münster, Germany
    • Posts 108
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    @soundproof

    I agree and think I will have to expand my Mini's RAM. Do you think it's imperative to have 2 GB or will one GB be sufficient for my purpose?

    |BV 7-32|BL 7-1|Ouverture|BL Penta|BL 6000|BL 2000|Beocom 6000|Beotalk 1200|MX 4000|Beoport|Beo4|Beo5|A8|A9|

  • 11-29-2007 12:38 PM In reply to

    • bwaje
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 11-22-2007
    • Paris - France
    • Posts 38
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    The best way to improve the mac mini is :

    - putting at least 1 gig of mem

    - changing the hard disk for a 7200 rpm

     

    Any mac mini (even first G4) can support Leopard, just search for Apple minimum config for Leopard. 

    b&otien
  • 11-29-2007 1:13 PM In reply to

    • David
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-05-2007
    • England
    • Posts 128
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    Have just found out that Airport Extreme will work with a PC not just a Mac. With this in mind would an itouch or iphone be able to access my itunes on my PC via the Airport Extreme? Would be great if this works because I wouldn't have to buy a Mac Mini. Has anyone ever tried this?

    Cheers,

    David.

    Beolab 8000, Beolab 6000, Beolab 2, LG CX65, Beosystem 3, Beosound 9000, Beolab 3500

  • 11-29-2007 2:12 PM In reply to

    • bwaje
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 11-22-2007
    • Paris - France
    • Posts 38
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    The iPhone seems windows-compatible, look here : http://www.apple.com/fr/iphone/specs.html
    b&otien
  • 11-29-2007 3:06 PM In reply to

    • David
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-05-2007
    • England
    • Posts 128
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    Thanks I will do more investigating.

    Beolab 8000, Beolab 6000, Beolab 2, LG CX65, Beosystem 3, Beosound 9000, Beolab 3500

  • 11-29-2007 3:21 PM In reply to

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    David:

    Have just found out that Airport Extreme will work with a PC not just a Mac. With this in mind would an itouch or iphone be able to access my itunes on my PC via the Airport Extreme? Would be great if this works because I wouldn't have to buy a Mac Mini. Has anyone ever tried this?

    Cheers,

    David.

    Remote Buddy is Mac only, and you'll need to be able to run that to get that functionality with an iPod Touch. 

  • 11-29-2007 9:57 PM In reply to

    • David
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-05-2007
    • England
    • Posts 128
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Mac Mini.Tiger or Leopard?

    Thanks Soundproof. ;-)

    Beolab 8000, Beolab 6000, Beolab 2, LG CX65, Beosystem 3, Beosound 9000, Beolab 3500

Page 1 of 1 (12 items)