in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 10-04-2010 4:56 AM by Alex. 4 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 10-04-2010 3:40 AM

    • jc
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-06-2007
    • The Netherlands
    • Posts 145
    • Bronze Member

    MX4200 pictureformat

    Bought a new MX 4200, which can handle both 4:3and 16:9 pictureformats. I don't understand how this should work; most broadcasts are in 16:9 these days, leaving the upper and lower part of the screen black, but setting the format to 16:9 further increases the black portion of he screen, ending up with a smaller screensize than with the pictureformat set to 4:3.

    Anyone who can shine a light here?

  • 10-04-2010 4:03 AM In reply to

    Re: MX4200 pictureformat

    Squeezing a (full) 16:9 picture on a 4:3 screen is called letterboxing. You only do it once, either at the source, or at the display device.

    You are probably watching an analogue broadcast, and there the letterboxing is usually done at the TV company if needed, resulting in a 4:3 transmission format with black bars at top & bottom. Therefore you need to keep the TV at the 4:3 setting.

    For a real 16:9 source, you'll need an STB, DVD player or some such - they will signal the TV through the SCART connector and tell it what the current picture format is, and the TV should switch automatically. So in practice, you should never need to manually set the format on the TV; only when there is something wrong in the setup, and the automatic signaling doesn't work.

    There are aspect ratio signalling systems for analogue transmissions as well, but there are still a lot of old TVs in use that don't know anything about them. That's why the networks usually choose to always transmit in 4:3 and do the letterboxing at the source, if needed. Unfortunately this also means that some of the available vertical resolution is lost for widescreen material.

    -mika

  • 10-04-2010 4:56 AM In reply to

    • Alex
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Bath & Cardiff, UK
    • Posts 2,990
    • Bronze Member

    Re: MX4200 pictureformat

    It was done primarily to integrate with widescreen TVs in a BeoLink system I think. When the Avant was in the range and producing widescreen images across a BeoLink system, the images appeared to be stretched vertically on 4:3 screens.

    It allows the MX4200 to accommodate for 'widescreen-only' video signals....

     Weekly top artists:                   

  • 10-04-2010 4:56 AM In reply to

    • Alex
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Bath & Cardiff, UK
    • Posts 2,990
    • Bronze Member

    Re: MX4200 pictureformat

    It was done primarily to integrate with widescreen TVs in a BeoLink system I think. When the Avant was in the range and producing widescreen images across a BeoLink system, the images appeared to be stretched vertically on 4:3 screens.

    It allows the MX4200 to accommodate for 'widescreen-only' video signals....

     Weekly top artists:                   

  • 10-04-2010 4:56 AM In reply to

    • Alex
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Bath & Cardiff, UK
    • Posts 2,990
    • Bronze Member

    Re: MX4200 pictureformat

    It was done primarily to integrate with widescreen TVs in a BeoLink system I think. When the Avant was in the range and producing widescreen images across a BeoLink system, the images appeared to be stretched vertically on 4:3 screens.

    It allows the MX4200 to accommodate for 'widescreen-only' video signals....

     Weekly top artists:                   

Page 1 of 1 (5 items)