My question is about copmponents system and integrated system (only B&O, without the models B&O family and year)?

There always seems to have been a B&O sound - good bass and detailed but possibly slightly softer treble that makes the sound very easy to listen to for extended periods. This can sometimes be characterised as veiled by Hi-Fi magazines. The newer ALT speakers do not have this!

Within the range, there has always seemed to have been an audio range , which is lower priced and offers better value, and a hi-fi range which offers better performance.

Examples would be the Beomaster 901, which was audio range and the Beomaster 3000-2 , which was hi-fi.

Peter :

There always seems to have been a B&O sound - good bass and detailed but possibly slightly softer treble that makes the sound very easy to listen to for extended periods. This can sometimes be characterised as veiled by Hi-Fi magazines. The newer ALT speakers do not have this!

Within the range, there has always seemed to have been an audio range , which is lower priced and offers better value, and a hi-fi range which offers better performance.

Examples would be the Beomaster 901, which was audio range and the Beomaster 3000-2 , which was hi-fi.

Thank's Peter. But my question was a little bit incorrect. I had in view of compearing between B&O component systems and B&O integrated systems. For example, somebody buy Beosystem 3300 (realy nice component system) and somebody buy Beocenter 9500+ turn table.  And  speakers, S 45-2. What of them would be better in sound?