|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Latest post 07-27-2009 3:17 AM by beologisch. 32 replies.
-
07-22-2009 7:33 AM
|
|
-
bsantini



- Joined on 08-31-2008
- Seaford, NY
- Posts 162

|
Seriously, without a better idea of how to program MYSELF to MY tastes, I feel my Beo 5 is a waste.
I also think, however, that even if I *did* know how to program it, I would always note the absence of a special quality continually noted elsewhere and included in the best B&O products, such as my ol' 1900 & 9500:
The Beo 5, IMHO, completely lacks any assemblence of satisfying *tactile* quality, unlike my Beo4.
Opinions?
Barry
|
|
-
-
Kokomo



- Joined on 08-21-2007
- Spain
- Posts 618

|
At the time of its launch, some, including myself, cast doubt upon it as a remote and particularly its shape. I don't own one but from the reports from those who do there are some 'issues' with it. There are those though who whatever the new product from B&O, always greet it as something wonderful. Witness the almost hysterical anticipation of the Beosound 5. It was the subject of frenzied discussion and comment months before its announcement. It didn't take long though for the hype to vanish and the reality of its severe limitaions to emerge.
"Great", "Beautiful", "Superb", "Gorgeous". Yes, Yes, Yes & Yes, but no wireless. "Oh" say the loyal fanatics, "Yes wireless would have been nice and the software's bad - but just look at it!"
Same with the Beotime. Just remember, after all is said and done, it's just an alarm clock! And a very expensive one at that.
I'm of the opinion that if B&O announced production of a house brick costing 200 Euros , there would those who would rush out to get it and then declare it to be the most wonderful, beautiful house brick ever made.
|
|
-
-
-
bayerische


- Joined on 12-11-2007
- Helsinki, Finland
- Posts 3,593

|
I actually like it, part from some things I still don't understand how to do it with it, but I'm sure I'll find out after using it for awhile. So much more versatile than the Beo4.
One bad thing is the display getting so dirty and greasy from fingerprints.
-Andreas
BLab5, BLab5000, BLab8000, BV10, BS9000, BS3, Beo5, Beo4, BLink1000, BLink5000, BLink7000, A2, A8, Form2
|
|
-
-
Quim43



- Joined on 11-15-2007
- Tarragona (Catalonia)
- Posts 1,030

|
I love it!
I don't use the Beo4 anymore. It is near my bed just to turn off the light when I go to sleep. I use the Beo5 for all my B&O devices, my Tvix, Sat Receiver Clarke Tech, Lights with Lutron Rania and RaOne Smartdimmer, blinds, curtains, air conditioner and my Roomba vacuum cleaner 
It's a great remote.
|
|
-
-
-
beologisch


- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Holland
- Posts 729

|
I've got no problems with my beo5 as I use it every day as well as several beo4 around the house; I've had it programmed once at my dealer's after thinking everything over well enough to make it work exactly like I wished/wanted, so I'm happy with it and beside that it's a more beautifull remote then the beo4 but not in everyway more practical though.
my wife had some problems with the display getting greasy [like she's had with her Iphony, but now ownes a serene] but since she stopped eating chips that "problem" has gone ;-)
Leon:
Beoworld's First "First Prize" winner.
"Carpe Diem et Dolce Far Niente"
|
|
-
-
-
Stan


- Joined on 04-17-2007
- Posts 593

|
Everybody at my house loves the Beo5. It also saved me thousands of
dollars. I was going to buy a sale priced BV7 MkIII w/no DVD primarily
for integration - I did not need 1/2 the features of the BV7 and was
going to stick it in a cabinet (shameful to not display its beauty),
but the 4 remotes in my living room (cable box, dvd, tv and Beo4 for
the speakers and link music) and 3-4 step on/off procedure (turn on/off
TV, cable box, dvd and speakers) was driving us crazy. The cable box's
"universal remote" could turn the TV on and off, but it was flakey
because it's a large room with a lot of outside light. It also could not control the TV's input selection or screen size.
Enter
the Beo5 and custom programming support found on this website (and a
few others). I now have one remote to control everything (ok, I
haven't programmed the dvd player yet, but will some cold winter
night). One button to turn everything on/off. Button presses work the
1st time all the time. I don't have to remember all the 3 digit
channel numbers or scroll thru pages of "tv guide" screens to find my
HD channels. I don't have to remember my FM station programming on my
BS (icons!!!). It's a great remote... although, not the way B&O
sells it (when I told my dealer my plans, he didn't think it was
possible and said "I'll sell you one, but as far as support, you're on
your own"). It took a few weeks to get all the buttons where I wanted
them - I would hate to be locked into having a dealer do this for me.
I
did look at other programmable remote controls, but their support of
B&O looked suspect (not so unlike the Beo5's support for non-B&O equipment, but I was more confident with the support I could find at this site), and they were ugly and almost if not more
expensive. If your Beo5 is sitting in a draw because it's not doing what you want, I would suggest dropping a line to Keith Saunders (click on the ad for custom Beo5 progamming on this site) and see if he can make it do what you want. It seems like the hardware is capable of controlling most anything.
OT: What's with all the negativism these last couple
days... BS5 worst product ever! Beo5 worst remote ever! Let's trash
the BS2, Beolink Wireless, BS3 and BeoLab4s again while we're at it
(common targets for disdain through the years, although the BS2 has
made something of a comeback). These are also 4 products that I own
and enjoy almost daily. I am not really bothered by this. I knew what these
products were when I bought them. Would I buy a B&O brick?
Probably not, but then, I haven't seen it yet in the flesh .
Granted it's a forum, we're just talking and everybody is entitled to
their own opinions, but are we having a bad summer or what?!? Or are
folks just stirring thing up because it's been so quiet around here
lately... or have I just been drinking too much B&O kool-aide (or been out in the sun too long), and
don't see what a company shill I've become. Anybody up for a pricing
thread?  
Cheers.
|
|
-
-
claudiu



- Joined on 04-16-2007
- denmark
- Posts 136

|
Do not understand why you do not like beo 5? For me is the best remote, you can change it to what you want, you can use in the dark, you can control everything absolutely everything. may be unique only to your house. beo4 love but is too old, do not do what I want from a remote. Last year use of beo 4 I remember I was crazy upset with button list and can not read in the dark. 
claudiu,
|
|
-
-
beopaul


- Joined on 07-28-2007
- USA
- Posts 68

|
My biggest peeve with the Beo5 is reaching for the top left corner of the touchscreen with my thumb, and my palm squeezes the Standby button. The Standby button is huge and too easy to accidently press. Also happens sometimes when trying to select Blue.
Aside from that, I have a BeoSystem 3 with Blu-ray and Mac Mini, plasma, and projector, as well as a couple LC1's, and Beo4 was just too limited, especially with regards to controlling the Blu-ray player. At least you have separate buttons for menu navigation and playback control (FF >>, REW <<, chapter skip \/ /\). The inner ring arrows are menu navigation, and the outer ring hard-keys are for playback control.
|
|
-
-
bsantini



- Joined on 08-31-2008
- Seaford, NY
- Posts 162

|
Lot's of good points in favor of the Beo 5.
But...I still can't program it myself for "everything" I want, and this means a no go.
Plus, I *can* operate my Beo 4 - IN THE DARK - without looking at it.
The tactile sensation of the button's "clicking" is quite re-assuring and satisfying.
I doubt one could say the same for the Beo 5.
My wish list: The ability to make a PUC controller for my BS3/BV9, so I could add products easily.
FWIW
Barry
|
|
-
-
-
-
Puncher



- Joined on 03-27-2007
- Nr. Durham, NE England.
- Posts 9,588

|
Peter :
Get Keith to program it for you - you will then no doubt love it and want to have its babies! I am probably going to do this myself!
Have Keith's babies??!!

Generally speaking, you aren't learning much if your lips are moving.
|
|
-
-
-
beoaddict


- Joined on 04-17-2007
- Dubai, UAE
- Posts 35

|
You start understanding the great quality and ease of use of a BEO4 when you buy a BEO5.......
Still getting used to it (and my wife only picks up the beo4).
|
|
-
-
-
beocool


- Joined on 10-17-2007
- the Netherlands
- Posts 5,514

|
I tried one at my dealer and wasn't impressed. Somehow the touchscreen didn't work properly. I really had to press very hard. My Beolink 7000 doesn't have that issue.
Beoworld's twenty-eighth ninth prize winner and fifty-first second prize winner. Best £30 I've ever spent!
|
|
-
-
TripEnglish



- Joined on 10-27-2007
- America
- Posts 1,595

|
I generally don't sell the Beo 5 to customers unless they:
A. Have a DVR built into their STB, which can be complex for wives and children (sorry to generalize!) and benefits from having very clearly labeled buttons on the screen for RECORD, DVR LIST, etc.
or
B. Have an integrated solution w/ devices like Lutron, Crestron, etc. where it is absolutely necessary.
That being said, the most successful stores are selling more B scenarios than anything else so the Beo 5 has paid dividends along with the ML Gateway as MVPs in the lineup.
There is scarcely anything in this world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little more cheaply. The person who buys on price alone is this man's lawful prey. - John Ruskin
|
|
-
-
erg4000


- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Posts 122

|
I don't hate mine anymore because I brought it back to my dealer after 4 weeks. 
- Not customizable (by the owner)
- Not ergonomic
- Not robust
- Not designed the way I like (the Beolink 7000 is the best)
- Nobody at home wanted to use it
Some stubborn people in Struer still refuse to deliver the software to their customers.
|
|
-
-
Dave


- Joined on 04-17-2007
- Brisbane, Australia
- Posts 2,328

|
That was the one thing that i disliked about it - it's lack of tactile pleasure
“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.”
Your health and well-being comes first and fore-most.
|
|
-
-
-
blue2th


- Joined on 05-28-2009
- Melbourne
- Posts 33

|
i think the BEO4 is too "old" for the present time. yes it is a tried and tested product, but surely B&O could have at the very least done a "Logitech" and simply update the housing with some minor tweaks and left it as a BEO4 with users continuing to love it.
the Harmony One by logitech is a nice size, well weighted, comes with a nice recharge base and fits well into anyone's palms. wish B&O would come up with something similar.
|
|
-
-
beoaddict


- Joined on 04-17-2007
- Dubai, UAE
- Posts 35

|
I miss the number keys. OK, I now they can be promted to the screen, but it is complete impossible to use them without looking at the screen.
Maybe that's the reason I prefer a blackberry bold above a iphone too.... (still under 40 yrs of age for those who wonder.....)
|
|
|
|
|