in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 07-17-2009 3:33 PM by a2bur. 6 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-10-2009 12:20 PM

    • cjfc
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 09-22-2007
    • Posts 45
    • Bronze Member

    BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    Hello all,

     

    I have done a few searches on the site but haven’t been successful in finding anything too similar to this request.

     

    I’m looking to upgrade my BC6-26 to a 32 inch TV (a 40 would be too large for the room / viewing distance).

     

    Therefore I am looking to compare the BV8-32 (with maybe 2xBL3 in addition) or BV7-32 (no dvd) with BL7-1

     

    No need for the DVD BV7-32 version as the set will be attached to my BC2 for DVD / audio master.

     

    What’s the consensus on difference in / best picture on SD content (most my viewing is via sky+) and DVD?

     

    Would love to see the two side by side but it seems the B&O shops near me in London don’t have both 8-32 and 7-32 in at the same time and hence would really appreciate your views

     

    Thanks

    Christian

  • 07-10-2009 1:29 PM In reply to

    • ChrDH
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Denmark
    • Posts 493
    • Founder

    Re: BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    Hi in my oppinion the picture of the BV8-40 is really something to consider, even in SD quality. But if 32 inch is really the max, the bv7 is in my oppinion the best looking.

    br

    Christian

    Beosound Ouverture, Beocenter 9000, Beovision MX6000, Beocord VX7000
  • 07-10-2009 1:45 PM In reply to

    • cjfc
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 09-22-2007
    • Posts 45
    • Bronze Member

    Re: BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    ChrDH:

    Hi in my oppinion the picture of the BV8-40 is really something to consider, even in SD quality. But if 32 inch is really the max, the bv7 is in my oppinion the best looking.

    br

    Christian

    Would be great to have a 40 but it's too wide for the space the tv would sit in. The 32 would fit perfectly and the viewing distance is about 2.5m to 3m so i think 32 should be the best size (my current 26 is just a little bit too small)

    I agree the bv7 looks best but is the quality of the picture significantly better than the bv8 in the 32 inch format to make the price difference worth paying?

    Thanks

    Christian

  • 07-10-2009 2:19 PM In reply to

    • moxxey
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-14-2007
    • South West, UK
    • Posts 2,360
    • Bronze Member

    Re: BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    Although I'm massively impressed with the BV8-40, the BV8-32 uses a different chassis. The worst thing about my BV8-26 is the lack of glass screen cover, which means that it gets far greasier than my BV7-40 and is harder to keep clean. I used to own a MKI BV7-32 and borrowed a MKII BV7-32 for a month and was really impressed with SD on the panel. If you could find a MKIII pre-loved BV7-32 (lots of them around), this could represent a good buy.

    Bear in mind the MKV BV7-32 is due soon (or is already out?) which will ship with the same chassis from the BV7-40 and 2 x HDMI sockets.

  • 07-16-2009 6:00 PM In reply to

    • cjfc
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 09-22-2007
    • Posts 45
    • Bronze Member

    Re: BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    moxxey:

    Although I'm massively impressed with the BV8-40, the BV8-32 uses a different chassis. The worst thing about my BV8-26 is the lack of glass screen cover, which means that it gets far greasier than my BV7-40 and is harder to keep clean. I used to own a MKI BV7-32 and borrowed a MKII BV7-32 for a month and was really impressed with SD on the panel. If you could find a MKIII pre-loved BV7-32 (lots of them around), this could represent a good buy.

    Bear in mind the MKV BV7-32 is due soon (or is already out?) which will ship with the same chassis from the BV7-40 and 2 x HDMI sockets.

    Thanks for the thoughts

    I think i'm swayed to the BV7-32, particularly the MKV - was just looking at a way of saving cash by getting a BV8 ...

    Does anyone have any experience of the MKV re picture quality on SD and DVD content? Plus does anyone know if any of the West London dealers have one on display to see?

    Thanks

     

  • 07-17-2009 2:57 PM In reply to

    • kallasr
    • Top 75 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 04-19-2007
    • Willich, NRW, Germany
    • Posts 1,077
    • Founder

    Re: BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    Well, for the viewing distance 40 inch would be far better than 32 inch.

    We do have a 50 inch tv at 3,5 meters and the picture is brilliant! (Pioneer Kuro)

    Ralf

    My Beo: Beosound 3000, Beolab 4000, Beo 4 DVD,  Beolab 5000/Beomaster 5000, Beovox S45.2 with Stands, Beosystem 7000 black with Beolink 7000, Beolink 1000, F1000 (3 cubes), Beovox 5000, Beovox 3000, Attyca 1.

  • 07-17-2009 3:33 PM In reply to

    Re: BV8-32 vs BV7-32

    I had doubts going from a Bv3 ( 32”) to Bv7-40 with a viewing distance of 2.5 mts. , thought it would be to dominating , got adjusted to it in a day and now wouldn’t go back to the 32” . See if they will let you try one for a few days , better than wondering if afterwards .

    Richard

     

Page 1 of 1 (7 items)