in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 07-25-2009 4:44 PM by TripEnglish. 29 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (30 items) < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-25-2009 10:08 AM In reply to

    • Michael
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-23-2007
    • Atlanta, USA
    • Posts 318
    • Founder

    Re: flatscreen televisions ver picturetube televisions picture quality

    burantek:

    bandoboy:

    Ok, this is my first reply on BeoWorld, so forgive me if I make a particular "faux pas".

    I currently have a 32" Avant with a standard Sky box fitted at the back, and I think the picture I get from it is nothing short of superb! Ok, if I want to play on the x-box the picture suffers a little but overall I think the picture I get from my tv beats many new LCD's hands down. Couple that with the sound that comes out of it and i'd like to see and hear a "mass produced" LCD do that!

    A friend of mine recently bought an LG  42" LCD TV, he read all the relevant reviews for it and made sure he got the latest model and paid a very tidy sum for it, but the picture and sound from it are awful! Ok, plug in an x-box/ps3 and the HD cables make a difference with picture, but again a standard def picture isn;t anything close to my 9 year old Avant.

    Cranking the sound up on "Guitar Hero" the other evening, ( I know, i'm old enough to know better!) and friends were just amazed. (Though doubt the neighbours were!).

    I love my Avant and HD television content is not high on my agenda, and it's only available in a limited way here in the UK, so why would i want to change?

    Plus I can;t find my wife's credit card to go and buy a new BV7-40. Damn, where has she hidden it!!??

    .

    Apparantly Burantek is speachless...Whistle

    -Michael

  • 07-25-2009 3:34 PM In reply to

    Re: flatscreen televisions ver picturetube televisions picture quality

    j0hnbarker:

    moxxey:

    I don't see the 'point' you are trying to make? Almost as if you're convincing yourself you don't more than a 32", HD, Blu-ray and so on.

    My old BV7-32 is tiny compared to the 40". I prefer the 40". I'm not saying I want anything larger than that, but I definitely don't want to go back. Also, what happens if you have a large room? It's often better to have the larger screen.

    Most movies are available in HD, most sport and so on. Fair enough most of it is SD, but I ain't going back to an old CRT on the basis of 'just because'. Move on John :)

    You're already moving on before the majority of transmissions have caught up with you - that's part of the point I was making. I just don't get it. You're so far ahead of the curve that you're actually thinking about replacing a HD set that won't work in HD for the majority of transmissions here in the UK. Surely that's a bit questionable?

    How big is your living room BTW? Mine is 25' long and my 28" Avant is more than enough. I do have good eyesight and good central heating though. Perhaps this is why I don't hanker after a huge screen hung on my wall??

    John,

    This must be a regional thing. Here in the US, most areas have HD versions of just about every channel available and nearly every program on those channels is native HD. A few years ago that point made a lot of sense, but today I can probably swear off SD and never miss a single program. 

    There is scarcely anything in this world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little more cheaply. The person who buys on price alone is this man's lawful prey. - John Ruskin

  • 07-25-2009 3:55 PM In reply to

    Re: flatscreen televisions ver picturetube televisions picture quality

    apart from every tv show made between say 1936 and 2005 ( filmed and produced in sd )

    but what's 70 years of culture between friends ?

    popgear is grate™

  • 07-25-2009 3:55 PM In reply to

    Re: flatscreen televisions ver picturetube televisions picture quality

    TripEnglish:

    j0hnbarker:

    moxxey:

    I don't see the 'point' you are trying to make? Almost as if you're convincing yourself you don't more than a 32", HD, Blu-ray and so on.

    My old BV7-32 is tiny compared to the 40". I prefer the 40". I'm not saying I want anything larger than that, but I definitely don't want to go back. Also, what happens if you have a large room? It's often better to have the larger screen.

    Most movies are available in HD, most sport and so on. Fair enough most of it is SD, but I ain't going back to an old CRT on the basis of 'just because'. Move on John :)

    You're already moving on before the majority of transmissions have caught up with you - that's part of the point I was making. I just don't get it. You're so far ahead of the curve that you're actually thinking about replacing a HD set that won't work in HD for the majority of transmissions here in the UK. Surely that's a bit questionable?

    How big is your living room BTW? Mine is 25' long and my 28" Avant is more than enough. I do have good eyesight and good central heating though. Perhaps this is why I don't hanker after a huge screen hung on my wall??

    John,

    This must be a regional thing. Here in the US, most areas have HD versions of just about every channel available and nearly every program on those channels is native HD. A few years ago that point made a lot of sense, but today I can probably swear off SD and never miss a single program. 

    Not the case here in the UK Trip. Most content on Sky is SD, and most people I know have Sky as opposed to cable etc., so at the moment I think the point is valid. Clearly things will move on, but as to how far and how fast this process will take place, I'm not clear. When I wake up 1/3 of the Sky content is HD without requiring an additional subscription, then maybe I'll reconsider...

    President, Beomaster 8000 Appreciation Society

  • 07-25-2009 4:44 PM In reply to

    Re: flatscreen televisions ver picturetube televisions picture quality

    John, I figured that had to be the issue. In that case your point really does stand that the Avant & a few other well forged CRT sets still blow away the flat panels. Size is not really a viable factor in the debate I suppose, but I'm still pleased as punch with my Avant and actually glad that I still have SD options in many cases as well. 

    As for Flappo, much of the content you described was shot in such a way that it can be remastered to suit HD transmission quite nicely. Check out Criterion's Blu-Ray offerings to see just how true this can be. 

    There is scarcely anything in this world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little more cheaply. The person who buys on price alone is this man's lawful prey. - John Ruskin

Page 2 of 2 (30 items) < Previous 1 2