Many thanks for everyone's comments. I will try to address some of them here. Trip does have the right understanding about me from what he writes; I am not the sort of person who mixes B&O with other gear, I have often mentioned that in other posts. I am very passionate about B&O and love their kit far too much to ever consider other brands.
I am driven fristly and foremostly by design, always have been. Functionality comes second and practicality always last. So, I would probably choose the TV that I prefer the design of rather than the better performer although of course its always nice to get the whole package. The only time I have ever swayed from this was with my 7-40 purchase which many members know about because I was staurating the forums with questions for almost a year before I bought it! I really, really, REALLY wanted to buy the BV5 because the design was just amazing to me, but on this one occasion and with some profit/loss calculations that were too hard to ignore I really had no choice but to buy the 7-40.
So, I like both the BV6 and the BV8 models in terms of design so no issue there to consider at all. I like both pictures, but I think that the BV6 has a DVI socket which means I could pick up my Sky HD through masterlink although I think that the signal would be sent via RF so I am not sure of picture quality loss etc. However, I am also aware from all my research with the 7-40 that on a 26 inch screen size HD will hardly make a difference, if at all.
Thanks for the link Andy to the TV under the bed video! Can't say I like it at all I am afraid!
It seems that there is no real winner between the BV6 and BV8 so I guess I'll follow my heart. I'll probably end up with the BV6 I think because I can get it for less on the second hand market and I have no issues with that at all. Just wondered if I had to worry much about a 4/5 year old well used TV.
Any other comments would be really useful along with what people would consider a fair price for a 4 year old BV6-26.
Simon.