Mark I and Mark II , is it right?

 What are different?

 Thank's

What are the type number ?

And mk3. Between the mk1 and mk2, there were quite vast improvements in DVD playback quality and responsiveness. The panel also changed each time I believe.

Not sure of the other differences!

Alex:

And mk3. Between the mk1 and mk2, there were quite vast improvements in DVD playback quality and responsiveness. The panel also changed each time I believe.

Not sure of the other differences!

Yes, the panel definitely changed. I had a MK1 and it had a 'gloomy' image (looked dark, overcast, lacked brightness). Was lent a MKII or MKIII for a month whilst it was in repair and it was significantly better - at least 25% brighter. I was rather disappointed when I received my fixed MKI after repair ;)

The Beovision 7-32 has the following "Type" numbers

• Mark I has type numbers 9310 through to 9320
• Mark II has type numbers 9321 through to 9329
• Mark III has type numbers 9331 through to 9339 plus 9399
• The new Beovision 32 without DVD has type numbers 9341 through to 9350

The fundamental change occurred when the Mark III Beovision 7-32 was introduced because it contained the Beosystem 3 chassis. The panels have also been changed.

moxxey:

Alex:

And mk3. Between the mk1 and mk2, there were quite vast improvements in DVD playback quality and responsiveness. The panel also changed each time I believe.

Not sure of the other differences!

Yes, the panel definitely changed. I had a MK1 and it had a 'gloomy' image (looked dark, overcast, lacked brightness). Was lent a MKII or MKIII for a month whilst it was in repair and it was significantly better - at least 25% brighter. I was rather disappointed when I received my fixed MKI after repair ;)

With the rapid changes in TV technology, I suppose this is somewhat inevitable.

Seems to me though to be a very good reason not to spend many many thousands of pounds/dollars/euros etc on a B&O TV ! 

PhilLondon:

I had not realised the latest 32 version had the BS3 chassis.

It doesn't, you are right.

kokomo:

Seems to me though to be a very good reason not to spend many many thousands of pounds/dollars/euros etc on a B&O TV ! 

I think that's somewhat unfair. Unless you're some kind of TV perfectionist, the latest BV7-40 MKIII is a fantastic TV, so is the BV9 and even the old BV5-HD is decent.

One advantage of B&O TVs is that you can upgrade - when the BV7-40 MKIV is out in 2009, I'll be either selling or trading in my TV and paying the extra to upgrade to the new model.

moxxey:

PhilLondon:

I had not realised the latest 32 version had the BS3 chassis.

It doesn't, you are right.

Only the BV7-40 has the BS3 chassis, the 32"-version doesn't.

Tom:

moxxey:

PhilLondon:

I had not realised the latest 32 version had the BS3 chassis.

It doesn't, you are right.

Only the BV7-40 has the BS3 chassis, the 32"-version doesn't.

Bizarre. That's what I've just said. Why said it again?

moxxey:

Tom:

moxxey:

PhilLondon:

I had not realised the latest 32 version had the BS3 chassis.

It doesn't, you are right.

Only the BV7-40 has the BS3 chassis, the 32"-version doesn't.

Bizarre. That's what I've just said. Why said it again?

Sorry, but I must have missed that post...

KingOfSnake:

Only the BV7-40 has the BS3 chassis, the 32"-version doesn't.

Just for good measure, only the BV7-40 has the BS3 chassis, the 32"-version doesn't.

Does the MK1 MK2 support the HD ready modul?

The MK3 is sell with the HD ready modul inside ? Or option??

Dave:

 

Just for good measure, only the BV7-40 has the BS3 chassis, the 32"-version doesn't.

Well, I see you all passed the Wednesday Test, very well done

I agree the Mark III 40 inch contains the Beosystem 3 chassis

moxxey:

kokomo:

Seems to me though to be a very good reason not to spend many many thousands of pounds/dollars/euros etc on a B&O TV ! 

I think that's somewhat unfair. Unless you're some kind of TV perfectionist, the latest BV7-40 MKIII is a fantastic TV, so is the BV9 and even the old BV5-HD is decent.

One advantage of B&O TVs is that you can upgrade - when the BV7-40 MKIV is out in 2009, I'll be either selling or trading in my TV and paying the extra to upgrade to the new model.

Trouble with that argument is that the latest product on the market is nearly always considered to 'State of the art' or 'perfect'.

Until the next development!

The upgrade option is of course a valid point, but expenditure of thousands is still necessary in the deal.