|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Latest post 02-29-2008 7:31 AM by jk1002. 22 replies.
-
-
-
jk1002
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Boston USA
- Posts 1,620
|
details please. where are the specs?
BS9000, BS2300, BC2, BL2500, BL3, Bl2, BS1, BV8, BC4, A8
|
|
-
-
-
ed7
- Joined on 12-06-2007
- uk
- Posts 297
|
Bingo: LED backlighting and price-drop ???
try sony!
|
|
-
-
moxxey
- Joined on 04-14-2007
- South West, UK
- Posts 2,360
|
Erik-nl: Specs. available for the Beovision 7 mk IV
And? Give us the specs. Even I could start a thread like that :) I'm guessing that you're suggesting they are preliminary specs and it's not going to be updated for a few months? I can't see them upgrading it much - perhaps two HDMI sockets? I'd be amazed if a £5K BS3 ended up in the £4K BV7-32.
|
|
-
-
-
-
moxxey
- Joined on 04-14-2007
- South West, UK
- Posts 2,360
|
ed7: where did you buy new bv7-32 for £4k????!!!!!!!!!
The BV7-32 is £4K without the (choice of) stand or (choice of) speaker. That's the basic price of the TV. Completely valid statement! I bought my original BV7-32 without a B&O speaker, for example. Quickly bought a 7.1 soon after though.
|
|
-
-
Flappo The Grate
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Posts 703
|
£4k and sound is an optional extra .. who ever said bno were expensive ???
|
|
-
-
-
jk1002
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Boston USA
- Posts 1,620
|
yes. so where are the specs coming from? And what are they. Just to post that there is a campaign and that there are specs is not very nice. Now we are all worked up. I am guessing a lot of people wait for this upgrade.
BS9000, BS2300, BC2, BL2500, BL3, Bl2, BS1, BV8, BC4, A8
|
|
-
-
-
-
Coolskin
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Holland
- Posts 505
|
Bingo: I hardly can wait for the specifications :-)
I'll ask my dealer to swap MKI for MKIII. Any idea what the difference will be in hard earned EURO's
|
|
-
-
-
-
joeyboygolf
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK
- Posts 3,252
|
Bingo: Will the 32 inch model fade out, because B&O upgrades that size so bad?
I hope not. I really am comfortable with that size of screen.
|
|
-
-
-
moxxey
- Joined on 04-14-2007
- South West, UK
- Posts 2,360
|
Doh, Flappo sometimes you really contradict yourself. A 46" or 50" LCD would be a poor choice with the majority of the content SD based. I would not like to watch SD-only football on a 50" BV7. It would be painful viewing. Why encourage B&O to go down this route - they already know about the pixelisation issues with the 40"!
A true HD signal would probably still look excellent on a 46" LCD.
|
|
-
-
Bieele
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Netherlands
- Posts 339
|
Fading out the 32 inch model would be a poor decision. I think it is the ideal size in combination with a projector for the real movie experience! Bieele
Heej zuij der alles veur gaeve
En heej zaet ze mogen ut hebbe van meej
|
|
-
-
-
-
jk1002
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Boston USA
- Posts 1,620
|
That makes me cringe for years now. I am hoping I am not an exception. Small TV with a projector. Even though I have to say that the BV4 in the beoliving house catalogue looks good. JK
BS9000, BS2300, BC2, BL2500, BL3, Bl2, BS1, BV8, BC4, A8
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (23 items)
|
|
|