in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 09-20-2011 3:24 PM by Puncher. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 09-20-2011 7:40 AM

    • Peter
    • Top 500 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 12-28-2009
    • Sweden
    • Posts 134
    • Bronze Member

    Beogram Record Deck..which one to choose?

    Gentlemen,
    (wonder if there are any women at all on this site?)

    I bought a Beogram 3300 about 10 years ago but have used it very little. It is in very good shape and has a MMC2 cartridge and when I bought it, it was as good as new. However, I found the sound a little "thin". I have a "no-name" RIAA amplifier to connect it to my BS2300 that was recommended and sold by my local B&O dealer.

    Just recently I got a Beogram 9000 that was sold together with a BC9000 and BL5000 (it was the speakers I was after..) so I sold the BG9000, with the cartridge from my BG3300 as the MMC4 fitted on it was not working properly and I have no use for two record decks. I got payed surprisingly well also! :-) I decided to keep my BG3300 since I like the design better.

    So, my questions:

    1. Mechanically and soundwise, are the BG3300, BG5000, BG9000 more or less the same record decks but in different designs?

    2. Which would you recommend: an original, never used MMC2 or MMC4 in its original package or a new made one from Soundsmith?

    3. Im thinking about really give my LP collection a record deck it deserves. What is the absolutely best record deck B&O has made?

    Thanks for any input!

    /Peter

  • 09-20-2011 9:58 AM In reply to

    Re: Beogram Record Deck..which one to choose?

    All the later tangential decks are the same apart from the fact that some have a built in RIAA. The only other material difference is the cartridge. They therefore all sound the same.

    From a cartridge point of view, I personally would have a rebuilt cartridge from Axel with a Shibata tip. Soundsmith cartridges are much brighter which may however be to your taste - I personally find them fatiguing to listen to.

    The best turntable made by B&O is the Beogram 4000 - nice heavy platter and beautifully made. An argument can be made for the 8000/8002 but this is less well made but has a very accurate drive system.

    The best turntable branded B&O is the Beogram 3000 Thorens which has a more extended bass that any of the other Beograms.

  • 09-20-2011 10:40 AM In reply to

    • Peter
    • Top 500 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 12-28-2009
    • Sweden
    • Posts 134
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Beogram Record Deck..which one to choose?

     

    Thanks for the quick reply, Peter!

    I really like the design of the BG 4000/4002/4004, but they are also getting very old..and it says in the description that the 02/04 are remote controllable. Would that work in combination with a BS2300 and BEO4? I assume its only with the older standard it works?

    Seems I might aswell keep the BG3300 and invest in a good cartridge instead I saw on the shallplattennadeln.de website that there is a significant price difference between MMC2 and MMC4, is it that more "bang for the bucks"? 

    Thanks,

    /Peter

     

     

  • 09-20-2011 3:24 PM In reply to

    • Puncher
    • Top 10 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 03-27-2007
    • Nr. Durham, NE England.
    • Posts 9,588
    • Founder

    Re: Beogram Record Deck..which one to choose?

    Peter:
    Mechanically and soundwise, are the BG3300, BG5000, BG9000 more or less the same record decks but in different designs?

    You mention the BG5000 which is a radial arm deck and many would say that it sounds superior to the tangential decks of the stacking system variants (5500, 6500 & 7000). (The tangential deck variant of the BS5000 was the BG5005).

    Generally speaking, you aren't learning much if your lips are moving.

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)