in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 10-29-2010 12:51 PM by Doctor. 10 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 10-27-2010 12:54 AM

    M70 or S45-2

    Plan to connect to a beomaster 4500 or 5500. Will use a beolink passive until I get the beomaster. Which one will be better with above amps. Will be in a basement and mostly play iPod. What do u guys suggest. I hope to acquire 4500 or 5500 beomaster soon for the beovox. Thanks

    Beovox RL 60.2, RL 6000, S45-2, CX 50, Cona, Beolink Passive, MCL2P, BM4500, Beosound 1, Beocenter 2500, Beolab 2500, Besound 4000, Beolab 4000, Beocom 6000, A8, Beosystem 1

  • 10-27-2010 1:09 AM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    The trumpet stand is more or less the only difference between the 2 types tecnically nearly no difference, check the product pages. the trumpet stand will look good in the basement

    Beosound 3000, BL 4000, BL 8000, BG 2404,BG 5000, BG CD50, Beocord 5000, BM 901, BM 2400, BM 4000, BV S45, BV 3702. There is nothing we cannot do, but a lot of things we don't want to do!!

  • 10-27-2010 3:32 AM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    The M70 is about twice the size of the S45 and has a fair amount more bass. The M series speakers are always the top of the range and will have the flattest frequency response and the best finish. The M70 is actually a generation before the S45-2 but is worth looking out for. The S45-2 is superb for its size and is very accurate but is bass light.

  • 10-27-2010 9:30 AM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    The S45-2 have the rubber rings. What about M70 - Will I run into to the foam rotting issues with M70

    Beovox RL 60.2, RL 6000, S45-2, CX 50, Cona, Beolink Passive, MCL2P, BM4500, Beosound 1, Beocenter 2500, Beolab 2500, Besound 4000, Beolab 4000, Beocom 6000, A8, Beosystem 1

  • 10-27-2010 10:50 AM In reply to

    • Evan
    • Top 25 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 12-15-2008
    • Ohio | USA
    • Posts 2,601
    • Gold Member

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    I love my S45-2s. They sound amazing. Plan on getting a pair Yes -  thumbs up

    PS never heard the M70. Just wanted to drive the S45-2 home! Laughing

    Evan

     

  • 10-27-2010 11:30 AM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    I want to agree - personally I have not yet heard a S45-2, but read a lot about them

    Beovox RL 60.2, RL 6000, S45-2, CX 50, Cona, Beolink Passive, MCL2P, BM4500, Beosound 1, Beocenter 2500, Beolab 2500, Besound 4000, Beolab 4000, Beocom 6000, A8, Beosystem 1

    Filed under: ,
  • 10-28-2010 11:24 PM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    Can anyone confirm if the M70 had rubber surround rings

    Beovox RL 60.2, RL 6000, S45-2, CX 50, Cona, Beolink Passive, MCL2P, BM4500, Beosound 1, Beocenter 2500, Beolab 2500, Besound 4000, Beolab 4000, Beocom 6000, A8, Beosystem 1

  • 10-29-2010 4:19 AM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    The M70 came with a variety of drivers which changed during production. I believe the surround of the woofer was subject to rot so may well need repairing. It is far better to have this repaired if possible than simply replacing the driver with a different type. That way you will keep the correct frequency response. Martin (Dillen on site) can give you far more information than I can.

  • 10-29-2010 7:41 AM In reply to

    • Teddy_fr
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • near Angoulême, France
    • Posts 250
    • Founder

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    I have a pair of M70 since more than 30 years and they work just like at their first days!
    The boomer is a bulletproof SEAS model with rubber surrounds. All of those I can see on "Ebay", "Leboncoin.fr", "Dba.dk" ... were always with rubber surrounds.
    I use them with a 150 W RMS Beomaster 8000 sometimes at 5.4 (the limits of "clipping") and they have never suffered from any problems!
    Their sound is very well tempered and their frequency response very linear, far better in my taste than the S45-2 that tend to be a bit "surgical" as we say in France, ie a bit aggressive for the ears. Smile

    Marc

  • 10-29-2010 8:31 AM In reply to

    • jc
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-06-2007
    • The Netherlands
    • Posts 145
    • Bronze Member

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    Is there much difference between the M70 and it's successor the M75?

  • 10-29-2010 12:51 PM In reply to

    Re: M70 or S45-2

    Completely different design, but outwardly very similar until you take the grilles off! The M70 is almost a monitor class S60 - similar layout but better drive units and a lot bigger. The M75 was almost the same size  though a little less deep but resembled the M100 with all the drive units arranged above each other. The M70 also has the stunning trumpet stands. It is interesting to see that the M70 is considerably heavier than the M75 and indeed is slightly heavier than the M100. Suggests that the bass unit has a very large magnet (good!) I have not listened to these two models side by side - could be interesting!

     

Page 1 of 1 (11 items)