in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 12-05-2007 7:42 AM by moxxey. 2 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 12-05-2007 6:49 AM

    BV7-40 mark ii versus BV7-40 mark iii

    I have the mark ii and unless you are looking at the screen full-on, the picture is washed out.  Is the mark iii any better or is this a basic fault in LCD TVs?
  • 12-05-2007 7:29 AM In reply to

    • 355f
    • Top 100 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-19-2007
    • Posts 655
    • Bronze Member

    Re: BV7-40 mark ii versus BV7-40 mark iii

    thorne:
    I have the mark ii and unless you are looking at the screen full-on, the picture is washed out.  Is the mark iii any better or is this a basic fault in LCD TVs?

    Due to the way LCd is manufactured none of them handle off axis viewing very well. You willhave to wait for Sharp mid next year to come up with a panel that due to its modified array will allow greater angles.

    Not for nothing does B&O have  avery good motorised stand so you can get it just right!

  • 12-05-2007 7:42 AM In reply to

    • moxxey
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-14-2007
    • South West, UK
    • Posts 2,360
    • Bronze Member

    Re: BV7-40 mark ii versus BV7-40 mark iii

    One positive thing I can say about recent B&O LCDs is that this (watching from an angle) is far less of a problem than on my BV7-32. Even the BV8-32 can be viewed successfully from a wide angle. I didn't think that this was a problem with the BV7-40 MKII, but it might be improved on the MKIII - it's all do with the viewing angle on an LCD. Modern LCD screens have a wider viewing angle than older screens.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)