|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
-
02-06-2012 3:22 AM
|
|
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
I have started to upgrade my Beovox 5000 MKIII designed for Beolab 5000 (1967-1972).
I am planning the following:
Replace the capacitors in the crossover network
Replace the internal wiring to the bass driver
Replace the external cable
Coat the cones of the midtone- and bass drivers
/Frede
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Replace the capacitors in the crossover network
Bipolar capacitors produced for more than 50 years ago are dried out and need replacement.
I will replace the capacitors with some (expensive) MKT film capacitors (metallised polyester film)
I am using some from Bennic and Monacor
Here you can see the old bipolar caps and the new film capacitors.
/Frede
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
I am going to start the process by replacing these capacitors.
You need to remove the bass speaker and some damping material.
Then you can see the crossover filter.
You can then remove the 4 bolts and careful remove the filter for a more easy restoration.
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
I don’t remove any wires at this stage.
I only pace the filter at the top of the cabinet and do the work here. I suggest using some protection between the filter and your Beovox 5000.
The process require a few changes to the filter because the new caps are physical much bigger and more heavy.
I will rearrange and I will use hot melt gluing of the caps.
This is the result of the rearranged part for the crossover filter.
The reason for gluing the parts is of course avoiding noise and vibrations.
more to come
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
Peter
- Joined on 02-12-2007
- Posts 9,572
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Fascinating - I should really do mine sometime! I am not convinced that the bass units in mine are original though - smaller dust caps.
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
I think yours are original Peter, the MKIII have been sold with 2 types of bass units - one with 'big dust cap' and one with small dust cap'
/Frede
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
casdave
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Posts 226
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
You may well find there is a significant advantage in replacing the wirewound resistors, modern ones are much more accurrate.
If you measure the values of these resistors, you may well get a shock, mine had drifted massively, you might imagine that a drift of a few Ohm isn't much, but when you are dealing with the low values found in crossover netowrks, that dirft can be over 100%.
How do I know, because I did this same exact thing a few years back.
Make sure to refix those chokes too, the glue will be on the way out.
|
|
-
-
casdave
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Posts 226
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Don't forget to check out the components on the crossover frequency adjustment controls too.
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Casdave,
First, thanks for your suggestions, I will certenly check - and remplacer if needed.
This is really interesting.
What was the final result of your restoration ?
/Frede
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
casdave
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Posts 226
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
The sound was pretty dull and lifeless, and this did improve things, however the addition of the cubes made all the differance in the world.Bass seems to go a bit deeper and less boomy.
It was not a massive improvement, but noticeable. Add up all these little improvements and it can make a big difference.
I also did a pair of Type Ks, the cones were gone at te edges, not an easy repair due to them being corrugated paper types. Now sorting these and the crossovers made a huge difference.The bass response is so much better. I would even argue that they sound nicer than the Beovox 5000.
The type S only needed the capacitors doing, but while you have the speakers apart, it is a good time to refinish the wood too. You'd be amaazed at just how grotty the cloth grilles have become.
|
|
-
-
Søren Mexico
- Joined on 09-13-2007
- Mexico city
- Posts 1,621
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
classic:
I don’t remove any wires at this stage.
I only pace the filter at the top of the cabinet and do the work here. I suggest using some protection between the filter and your Beovox 5000.
The process require a few changes to the filter because the new caps are physical much bigger and more heavy.
I will rearrange and I will use hot melt gluing of the caps.
This is the result of the rearranged part for the crossover filter.
The reason for gluing the parts is of course avoiding noise and vibrations.
more to come
Sure looks crowded, I dont see the 3rd coil, is it hidden under the 68 Mu cap, and did you glue the cap to the coil ??
Beosound 3000, BL 4000, BL 8000, BG 2404,BG 5000, BG CD50, Beocord 5000, BM 901, BM 2400, BM 4000, BV S45, BV 3702. There is nothing we cannot do, but a lot of things we don't want to do!!
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Søren Mexico:
Sure looks crowded, I dont see the 3rd coil, is it hidden under the 68 Mu cap, and did you glue the cap to the coil ??
Yes, the 68uF cap is glued on top of the coil and to the other 68uF cap.
/Frede
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
Søren Mexico
- Joined on 09-13-2007
- Mexico city
- Posts 1,621
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
classic: Yes, the 68uF cap is glued on top of the coil and to the other 68uF cap.
If you had to take it out again, wouldn't the glue damage the coil ??
By the way I use transparent silicone for gluing, it takes longer time to set, but is easier to clean of and more flexible when dry, the glue from the heatgun gets very hard.
Beosound 3000, BL 4000, BL 8000, BG 2404,BG 5000, BG CD50, Beocord 5000, BM 901, BM 2400, BM 4000, BV S45, BV 3702. There is nothing we cannot do, but a lot of things we don't want to do!!
|
|
-
-
classic
- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Venø - Struer / Denmark
- Posts 224
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Søren Mexico:
If you had to take it out again, wouldn't the glue damage the coil ??
Please have a look at the photo of the filter "before" upgrade (2.nd. photo on this thread) - you will see the the "pertinax" washer on top of the coil.
/Frede
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"
|
|
-
-
Rich
- Joined on 07-10-2010
- Orlando, Florida, USA
- Posts 1,089
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
classic:
I don’t remove any wires at this stage.
I only pace the filter at the top of the cabinet and do the work here. I suggest using some protection between the filter and your Beovox 5000.
The process require a few changes to the filter because the new caps are physical much bigger and more heavy.
I will rearrange and I will use hot melt gluing of the caps.
This is the result of the rearranged part for the crossover filter.
The reason for gluing the parts is of course avoiding noise and vibrations.
more to come
Everything I've read over at diyaudio.com would lead me to believe those two inductors (coils/chokes) are too close together and should be separated to prevent magnetic field interferences.
Current primary listening: SMMC20EN -> BG4002 -> BM4000 -> Beovox M70
|
|
-
-
Søren Mexico
- Joined on 09-13-2007
- Mexico city
- Posts 1,621
|
Re: Beovox 5000 - Upgrade
Rich: Everything I've read over at diyaudio.com would lead me to believe those two inductors (coils/chokes) are too close together and should be separated to prevent magnetic field interferences.
Here is my 3702 original filter, induktors allso close together.
Beosound 3000, BL 4000, BL 8000, BG 2404,BG 5000, BG CD50, Beocord 5000, BM 901, BM 2400, BM 4000, BV S45, BV 3702. There is nothing we cannot do, but a lot of things we don't want to do!!
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (16 items)
|
|
|