Peter: I take it you mean the tractor drive one rather than the tuner? Looks wonderful and the glass top is what the earlier BM6000 quad should have had.
I am going to disagree with Casdave on this one though - very unusual! It is an indirectly coupled amplifier and seems a step backwards in amplifier design compared to designs like the 1500 and more like a 901. The control mechanism, although wonderful to look at, is actually clumsily executed with fragile plastic parts that mean it is unreliable. The tuner is OK though. I remember it coming out, and my dealer advising me to avoid it! (Thanks Dennis!) I did get one later on to add to my collection, and he was right! The 2200 is much the same price now, if not cheaper and blows both the 1700 and 1900 out of the water.
The 1700 does look good though!
A quick note only...
The Beolab 1700 and Beomaster 1700 are of the very same family as Beomaster 901. All is based on the 901 development and is variations of this circuit design. There is one very critical point regarding the cabinet. More than 70% of all the product are not cosmetical 'nice' anymore. This is because the wood on the two sides of the cabinet does not go very well plastic, which 'holds' the wood.
However even if a restoration seems easy, original veneer as B&O allways have used is not easy to find in the correct quality and 'look'.
The above problem of the cabinet goes for all the products in the 901 family or 26xx series.
But --- I think the Beolab 1700 and Beomaster 1700 is a very good looking system. The two are designed to be used together and is very rare and 'unknown'.
Beolab 5000 - "If another amplifier sounds different then it needs repair!"