Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
I have popped back to the site just to contribute to this item. I don't think they are faulty Dave. When the 9's first came out I went into my local B&O shop to audition them. My question to the salesman was "Where is the midrange?"
-
I tend to agree with Lee on this one and I am not sure that cutting prices is the answer. I can only help the conversation by mentioning again some of the things that I have mentioned before. The introduction of flat screens has tested their design capabilities (except at the very top of the range). However if they did what they do do a little bit better
-
Oh No! Not another Non-B&O sub question? Not at all! I am just popping back to the site to provide some useful info on my selection of a non B&O sub. I am not saying that its the best in the world but it has a nice sound and some useful attributes. The choice was an REL R305 retailing at about £800. If you have an F1000 with two cubes
-
joeyboygolf Don't understand your comments at all! However I will not try and convince you of my argument any more. Two small points though. One is repetition -- ALL my a-v equipment is B&O not just some of it and if I choose to go in a different direction it doesn't mean that I don't enjoy B&O. Second is that you have got to be
-
Soundproof, Thanks for your comments. I will print you message out so that I can reflect on what you have said more seriously. I think what drew me to the arcam is twofold (a) I have owned it in the past (along with quad) and like it. (b) The unit had 5.1 connectivity at pre-amp output stage allowing me to maintain connection with my speakers through
-
joeyboygolf: My personal thoughts on this matter are,thus. If you want to go, go now. Don't keep bleating about it. I don't see the point! I am surprised at this statement. I wasn't bleating --am not bleating but was simply responding to a point. The beginning of this thread was all about connectivity between B&O and non-B&O something
-
Yes is the simple answer to that statement. However the reason why is because (for whatever reason whether it be misunderstanding or otherwise) I came away from ordering my BV6-26 in 2005 with the understanding that it could receive HD reception even if it be through a DVI socket with all its limitations. I now understand that this is not the case and
-
That was certainly my motivation for the change but I want it to be evolutionary rather than revolutionary which isn't always easy.
-
When they installed mine in 1999 when it was used in connection with a BC2300 they installed a converter. I didn't ask any questions at the time but they went from Aux on the 2300 to the converter and then Masterlink from the converter to the 3500.
-
I am an all B&O household and have been for ten years odd now. So the world of RCA connector etc are a stranger to me. My de-beofication thread stated my objective which is to move slowly away from B&O and I have given it much thought about how to do it. I have no wish to throw away perfectly good av stuff but the next generation in my house