Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Search

Page 2 of 11 (108 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
  • Re: Beosound 2 review: Hmm

    i really understand what you did talk about, but i know it's present, it does not mean I hate it. I really feel the so called "white noise" and "lack of bass" is acceptable in my standard. As you said, its sound is great for some other areas
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-12-2007
  • Re: Beosound 3 radio tuner stereo or mono?

    well, I am sorry that beosound 3 does not satisfy you. Good luck to your BOSE then actually, in my mind, BOSE cannot compare with B&O for similar level products. I feel B&O gives much better sound and design. For radio reception, I understand shops usually perform bad, but actually in home, it is excellent. Clear and no audible noise. Well.
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-12-2007
  • Re: Beosound 2 review: Hmm

    welcome to beosound 2, the greatest mp3 player ever. As the time invented beosound 2, it was the world of USB 1.0, and there was 128MB, 256MB cards usually, so USB 1.0 is very obvious for the connection speed. So now, they allow you to write to SD card by USB 2.0 and put it into the player. So you can use Beosound 4 for the input media. About white
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-11-2007
  • Re: Beosound 2 OSX and iTunes

    sure it is always possible... actually this is the fastest method. But I guess they mean they wanna connect beosound 2 directly to computer, it is the slowest method.
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-09-2007
  • Re: Beosound 2 OSX and iTunes

    from B&O replies before, they told me that it is not compatible with intel Mac at this moment. Perhaps you may install windows on mac, and try windows??
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-08-2007
  • Re: Beosound 3 radio tuner stereo or mono?

    it has mono speaker only, but everything is under stereo. In terms of reception, it is quite acceptable. But i think it is worse than beosound 1 definitely. Yes, it does not have aerial input, so if your place is really very bad in terms of signal strength, i guess beosound 3 is not too suitable if you want cleanest sound also. But if terms of sound
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-08-2007
  • Re: Any thoughts on the Beosound 1?

    Hello, i am a new user of beosound 1 too, and i own beosound 3 also. beosound 1 is a great INDOOR portable system. Maybe I am not strong enough, I think I will prevent from taking it away from home. beosound 3 is a better choice is this aspect. For sound, actually i bought BS3 before BS1, I feel beosound 1 is not that big improvement frmo beosound 3
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 08-07-2007
  • vintage vs. modern B&O products

    Many times, usually audio things, the vintage one does a better job than modern version. I am interested if these "rule" applies to B&O or not. e.g. vintage radio vs. modern radio (e.g. beosound 3) and what I am interested is CD players and speakers e.g. vintage CD players vs. modern one (e.g. beosound 1) in my mind, I think vintage players
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 07-28-2007
  • Re: New BEO-remote

    will B&O cut beo4 after beo 5? So we have to decide which one we should buy... so do you mind sharing the areas of imperfection of beo4 remote control? thanks a lot.
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 07-26-2007
  • Re: Do and Don't for beosound 1 please

    thanks for new participants. Unfortunately, beosound 1's location is far from TV aerial port. So what else can I do?
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Beo on 07-21-2007
Page 2 of 11 (108 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »