[quote user="bayerische"]You are right, I for one, never understood the 16:9 format... Movies were never made in this format. I think it was judged upon our eyes field of view... (16:9)[/quote] Actually, I strongly suspect 16:9 was chosen as it was the halfway point (=compromise) between TV (=4:3, or 12:9 if you like) and Cinema (=2.39:1,

DeZed: How must the divide look like where the two cables from each headphone get-together to one? In the youtube video is a difference... But everywhere I look, it looks like the "fake" in this video... http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=sZMKFHYAY7U @ 1 min 17, the video says that left is the "original" I asked this same question a few

Would echo these comments. Had this one about 2 years (original was replaced under warranty) and is in great shape, despite being in daily use. Although I was given an iPhone by my former employers ;-) , I prefer to use the Serene as my phone because a) I really only want to make calls with a phone and b) it's a little more interesting than the

EOB: MX series +1. Particularly, MX1500 or MX4000. Those photos in brochures of the time showing the MX1500 placed on the bedroom floor were selling a very beautiful lifestyle as well as an incredibly well designed product that was very much of its time but simultaneously classic. The 4000 is probably even more beautiful, but strangely out of place

I don't have a 'mark 1' handset around, but we have the revised version, and the current version - and I don't think either has a menu option for activating caller ID. We never had caller ID until recently, but when BT activated it, it just worked by magic on both BeoCom 6000 systems and on the BeoTalk 1200. I guess it's best to

Dammit I still haven't won! Always next month, I guess! Congrats to those that did!

My trusty A8s finally wore out after 7 years of iPod duty - the classic intermittent cutting out of one channel caused by break in the connection at the plug. After a few days of fiddling with the plug to try and get complete sound, I went into B&O in Canary Wharf where I was working until recently, and bought a new pair. Not sure if it's just

Update - all working fine. Many thanks again for the cordless socket suggestion, the DistyBox works fine - only issue was that it only has pins 3 and 4 connected on the socket, whereas for some reason the splitter that's supplied with the BeoTalk uses 2 and 5, even for the line connection. Having found another thread on here that pointed me to that

Found another thread on here with the answer... the splitter supplied with the BeoTalk only had pins 2 and 5 connected on the line connection. Local B&O dealer gave me a splitter from the old-style BeoCom PSTN base which has pins 3 and 4 connected - so works with the DistyBox cordless socket (and thanks to Sensotronic for the cordless socket suggestion

Have just found in the DistyBox manual that the line socket connection is to the two middle connections (pins 3 and 4) - are these the right connections for the line connection to the BeoTalk??