|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
-
Hi Søren (I correctly spelled your name, this time ), any contribution would be veeery well accepted! As for your second 'not fast-forwarding' 9000, try to start the autocal not exactly at the beginning. The deck will not need to fast-forward to pass over the non magnetic leader. If the rewind works, then the autocal will complete successfully
-
Great post, Soren! I see you have 2 BC 9000's. Are they consistent in their results? Edit: I tried another nos 1979 SA C-90 and repeatedly trying autocal I often found the bias values are perfectly balanced... I'm not that certain I'll refine calibration, after all... I have other quality stuff, but this is my first Beocord. How would you
-
Hi Jacques, thanks for the reply. Did you carry on the complete calibration, as per service manual, or did you start directly at page 3-6 , with record calibration? I have tried a nos 1979 TDK SA C-90 (which I strongly believe is the stock tape used for calibration) and the Beocord gives a constant 0,5 dB higher value for the left channel. I tried at
-
-
Hi Jacques, I recently got a Beocord 9000. It seemed like someone tried some adjustment inside, but after azimuth calibration, playback level calibration (I set 200 nWb/meter as -1dB on the meters) and line out level (all heavily misadjusted) the deck is fine. I haven't had the chance to measure its frequency response yet, but according to a Audio
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
|
|
|