I'd like you to ask him why B&O think it's acceptable to sell a £10K TV (BV7-40 MKIV) that could be argued is not 'fit for purpose' under UK law, which crashes watching Sky HD in a multi-room environment. Sky HD is embedded in millions of homes through the UK, so it's hardly uncommon.
B&O have had issues with the BV7-40 (III now IV) and Sky HD ever since I bought the MKIII in November 2007. We've had countless issues which seem to take 6 months to resolve. The latest issue has taken over 6 months with no sign of a sw fix in the near future.
How do B&O think this is acceptable? Why do B&O not offer an alternative TV as compensation - even temporarily - whilst they fix their own issues.
I'm close to considering legal action against B&O UK simply as they can't resolve their own issues. A crashing TV should be top priority. According to the B&O people I've talked to, it's not been taken seriously.