<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BeoGram </title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/29.aspx</link><description>Have a specific BeoGram Record Deck related question? Ask here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: Early Beogram 4002 Compared to Later Models</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/356460.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:19:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:356460</guid><dc:creator>Step1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/356460.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=356460</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not aware of any major changes to the main PCB except with the swap from AC to DC motor. Would have only been minor changes after that I think!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only exception is when the 4004, then the 6000 was released the former had remote datalink (I use the word &amp;#39;data&amp;#39; rather casually here!) and the latter a CD4 / RIAA board, both PCB&amp;#39;s being placed under the keypad with no major changes to the main board. Shame there was never a 6004 - I guess would have needed a new lead and DIN with the extra wires!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Early Beogram 4002 Compared to Later Models</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/356458.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:19:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:356458</guid><dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/356458.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=356458</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Cost cutting measures I am sure. However they really do sound much the same! The later ones are easier to maintain but I like the heavy platter of the 4000. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Early Beogram 4002 Compared to Later Models</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/356428.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:42:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:356428</guid><dc:creator>jfrancis</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/356428.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=356428</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I might just not be aware, but has there ever been a discussion about how the earlier models of the BG 4002 compare to the later models in quality or function. I know that with the earlier model 4002 the motor was originally AC and the platter was heavier like the 4000 and in 1 piece. Also the main board was very different from later models. It would be logical to assume the changes made were to improve the 4002 turntable but at the same time most people know the changes from the 4000 to 4002 were to cut costs not to improve on the BG 4000, which is considered the superior table from what I understand. Like to hear people&amp;#39;s thoughts on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>