<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BeoGram </title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/29.aspx</link><description>Have a specific BeoGram Record Deck related question? Ask here.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254568.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:03:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254568</guid><dc:creator>dbxdx5</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254568.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254568</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback on my original post. I went ahead and ordered the MMC2 from Axel. I&amp;#39;ll report back when it arrives and I&amp;#39;ve had a chance to break it in a little. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254523.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:46:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254523</guid><dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254523.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254523</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I do remember these coming out and being told that the 1 and 2 are identical but the 1 was the best performing as it was selected cartridges found on testing. However the catalogues do suggest that the ETM of the 1 is lower which would suggest a longer contact area. Either way, I doubt that an average Beogram would allow the differences to be heard! Of course neither of these cartridges had the lowest ETM - that prize went to the MMC6000 at 0.22.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254518.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:25:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254518</guid><dc:creator>tournedos</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254518.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254518</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I always thought so too, but then noticed that Beocentral lists the effective tip mass of MMC1 as 0.25 g, vs the 0.3 grams of MMC2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have no idea which property, smaller ETM or hand picking, would provide a bigger audible difference though!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254517.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:17:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254517</guid><dc:creator>Medogsfat</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254517.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254517</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I would imagine it would be the same as a MMC2 Lee. IIRC, MMC1&amp;#39;s were simply handpicked MMC2&amp;#39;s. I&amp;#39;m sure Peter et al will correct me if I&amp;#39;m wrong!!!!&lt;img src="http://forum.beoworld.org/emoticons/35.gif" alt="Hmm" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254466.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:47:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254466</guid><dc:creator>9 LEE</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254466.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254466</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Does Axel do MMC1&amp;#39;s - if so, how much does he charge?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lee&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254446.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:42:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254446</guid><dc:creator>joeyboygolf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254446.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254446</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with Peter re the Axel MMC2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254409.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:11:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254409</guid><dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254409.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254409</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a rebuilt MMC2 courtesy of Axel and it is superb - just as good as the original. Very good value for money as well. You can of course make any of the MMC range into a 2 as the only difference in these cartridges is the cantilever and diamond and this is changed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rebuilt MMC2--worth it?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254400.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:26:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:254400</guid><dc:creator>dbxdx5</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/254400.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=254400</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Right now I have a rebuilt MMC5 on my Beogram 1800 (Axel did the rebuild). I like the sound, but of course now I wonder how much better things can get with a better cartridge. I&amp;#39;ve read some of the conversations about the sound of Axel&amp;#39;s rebuild vs. the SMMCs of Sound-Smith, but I&amp;#39;d like to know if anyone has had experience with a rebuilt MMC2 specifically, and whether it would be worth the investment compared to going with, say, a Sound-Smith SMMC3. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>