<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BeoWorld North America</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/20.aspx</link><description>The North American market differs slightly from that in Europe.  For those in Canada, Mexico and the USA, this forum will help resolve those differences and answer your questions.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: CDX 'VS 4500</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/133098.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:16:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:133098</guid><dc:creator>Friedmett</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/133098.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=133098</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I can only vote for the CDX. It sounds very good despite the Phillips connection and age.&amp;nbsp;The sound is not as shrill or highend and even high end hardrock like Motorhead sounds great. &amp;nbsp;Very simple to use and easy to connect to anything. I don&amp;#39;t miss Datalink on it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mine is used with a Beolab 8000 system&amp;nbsp;with Beogram 8002, Beocord 9000 and Beomaster 8000&amp;nbsp;using Beovox M150. It&amp;#39;s hard to find the best sounding unit but the CDX compares greatly here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have no regret spending the money on getting it repaired. It pays well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: CDX 'VS 4500</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/133076.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:133076</guid><dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/133076.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=133076</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Had both and found the 4500 very neat but without a Datalink system it is not as useful. The CDX works with anything! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The CD4500 can sound fantastic - it is supposed to have a TDA1541 DAC but some have a TDA1541A which is supposed to be superior.&amp;nbsp; The CD5500 is better still as it does have a slightly different architecture. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: CDX 'VS 4500</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/133028.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:23:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:133028</guid><dc:creator>rayfenwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/133028.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=133028</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, my CDX hasn&amp;#39;t arrived yet, but I have listened to the machine it is based on, the Philips CD-104.&amp;nbsp; This is a 14 bit machine, and has a very &amp;#39;analogue&amp;#39; sound that sounds great though older stuff.&amp;nbsp; They are a very solid and dependable mechanism, with laser failure almost unheard of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The CD4500, (which I owned last year) is a newer player in terms of 16 bit resolution, and the fact it has datalink so can be controlled remotely and via a suitable Beomaster. Sound-wise it is more open and airy, but not necessarily better.&amp;nbsp; A lot depends on what the rest of your system is, after all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For me at least the CDX looks flashier in terms of that loading mechanism, but the CD4500 has the advantage of wall mounting, and also looks FABULOUS as part of a Beosystem 4500.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope this help a little &lt;img src="http://forum.beoworld.org/emoticons/07.gif" alt="Unsure" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>CDX 'VS 4500</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/132980.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:15:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:132980</guid><dc:creator>Piaf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/132980.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=20&amp;PostID=132980</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;I have a Beogram CDX and am completely delighted with it. However I see posts regarding the Beogram 4500, which looks similar but by all accounts is much superior to the CDX. Is this true?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;And if so, what is the ultimate Bang &amp;amp; Olufsen CD player?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;Jeff&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>