General Forum

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

jk1002 — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:31:19 GMT

That makes me cringe for years now. I am hoping I am not an exception. Small TV with a projector. Even though I have to say that the BV4 in the beoliving house catalogue looks good.

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:46:00 GMT

Seeing oversized TV's in small rooms is really making me cringe lately. Why are people doing it?

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Alex — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:45:56 GMT

True. I think the sizes B&O have at the moment are ideal for the UK, if anything a little too big at times. Discontinuing the 6-23" was a bad move IMO, they should have looked at producing something very small like the MX1500, but with their own TV inside...

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Bieele — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:37:29 GMT

Fading out the 32 inch model would be a poor decision. I think it is the ideal size in combination with a projector for the real movie experience!

Bieele

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

moxxey — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:16:06 GMT

Doh, Flappo sometimes you really contradict yourself. A 46" or 50" LCD would be a poor choice with the majority of the content SD based. I would not like to watch SD-only football on a 50" BV7. It would be painful viewing. Why encourage B&O to go down this route - they already know about the pixelisation issues with the 40"!

A true HD signal would probably still look excellent on a 46" LCD.

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Flappo The Grate — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:56:45 GMT

hopefully they'll bring out a 46 inch lcd , maybe even a 52 as 32 doesn't really show off hd properly

imo a 32 inch hd lcd is a tad pointless , my brother has a sony 32d3000 and the picture is excellent but just far too small to give any feeling of the cinematic experience , in a bedroom it may suffice but in a front room it would just be lost

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

joeyboygolf — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:12:26 GMT

Bingo:

Will the 32 inch model fade out, because B&O upgrades that size so bad?

I hope not. I really am comfortable with that size of screen.

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Bingo — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:42:56 GMT

Will the 32 inch model fade out, because B&O upgrades that size so bad?

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

BartS — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:22:27 GMT

As I understood from my dealer there will be no update for the 7 32 soon.

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Coolskin — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:10:07 GMT

Bingo:
I hardly can wait for the specifications :-)

I'll ask my dealer to swap MKI for MKIII.

Any idea what the difference will be in hard earned EURO's

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Bingo — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:20:39 GMT

I hardly can wait for the specifications :-)

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

ed7 — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:07:56 GMT

moxxey:
To be fair Flappo, we've going way off target with this discussion. We're supposed to be talking about the so-called new BV7-32 MKIV, not yet another discussion about how expensive B&O technology is these days. It's always like that. Instead of discussing, just don't buy. They'll get your message sooner rather than later.

i paid for mine the going rate panel,speaker,stand,i think flappo got a point too maybe if they sell it for 4k(all inclusive) they may sell them like hot cakes as they did with the avants

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

jk1002 — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:18:25 GMT

yes. so where are the specs coming from? And what are they.

Just to post that there is a campaign and that there are specs is not very nice. Now we are all worked up. I am guessing a lot of people wait for this upgrade.

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

moxxey — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:10:21 GMT

To be fair Flappo, we've going way off target with this discussion. We're supposed to be talking about the so-called new BV7-32 MKIV, not yet another discussion about how expensive B&O technology is these days. It's always like that. Instead of discussing, just don't buy. They'll get your message sooner rather than later.

Re: Beovision 7 mk IV

Flappo The Grate — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:57:46 GMT

£4k and sound is an optional extra

who ever said bno were expensive ???