<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Forum</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/13.aspx</link><description>The main Meeting Place for BeoWorld members, and the place for General Questions, Answers and things to say! 
If you have any questions about anything Bang &amp;amp; Olufsen related - please ask. If you have anything to say - please tell!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/50299.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:43:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:50299</guid><dc:creator>henrik</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/50299.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=50299</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://forum.beoworld.org/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Keith Saunders:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Graham said the MX4002 is a later product than the MX4000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Yes, but they were sold side by side for approx eigth years - so a 2nd hand 4002 could in theory be up to eight years older than a 2nd hand 4000.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/50247.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:07:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:50247</guid><dc:creator>deaddruid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/50247.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=50247</wfw:commentRss><description>That&amp;#39;s very clear now. Thank you, Keith.

Mark&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49914.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:40:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49914</guid><dc:creator>Keith Saunders</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49914.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49914</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Graham said the MX4002 is a later product than the MX4000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The MX4002 has Masterlink meaning it is compatible (i.e. the same as Masterlink today) on current B&amp;amp;O products. Because it is a link product there was no requirement for such extras as a satellite module actually in the TV itself. If you wanted to view satellite on your MX4002 you would connect the MASTERLINK to a master video device such as an AVANT which could have a satellite module fitted in it and those satellite programmes can be called up in the on your MX4002 in the link room&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49905.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:29:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49905</guid><dc:creator>deaddruid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49905.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49905</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Keith.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m afraid that I still have difficulty working out what can go into what. I guess this is a natural consequence of a supplier where we are supposed to rely on them to sort it out. This is fine for new equipment, but confusing when collecting electronic antiques.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49898.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:08:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49898</guid><dc:creator>Keith Saunders</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49898.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49898</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Beomaster really answered your first question, but I will state it in a different way:-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;The MX4000 can have an Beosat LM fitted and that is the only option as far as I am aware.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The Beosat LM is for analogue reception.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The MX4000 has datalink and the MX4002 has Masterlink&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49890.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:44:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49890</guid><dc:creator>deaddruid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49890.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49890</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you each for your help. Two follow-on questions, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Is there a list of these add-on modules, such as the satellite module, somewhere on the beoworld site? I would love to see a matrix of TV models vs modules, and details on the modules.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Is the satellite module designed for reception of analogue or digital signals?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49835.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49835</guid><dc:creator>Beomaster</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49835.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49835</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi!MX 4002 was the Beolink Version of the MX 4000. It was designed as a Link-Room-TV. They have a Masterlink (ML) connection built in.&amp;nbsp;The MX 4000 was designed as a Main-Room (but can`t work as a master like the Avant or AV9000) &amp;nbsp;or stand-alone TV. As an option you can fit it with an Satellite-modul! That`s not possible with the 4002!!! You can use the 4000 for a Link-Room, too. All you need is an Datalink-Masterlink converter.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So, if you are looking for a link-Tv choose the 4002. But if you need a satellite-modul it`s better to choose the 4000Sat with a converter!As a Main-Tv or stand-alone Version only a 4000 or 4200 (latest version of the 4000Series) will be the correct choise!GreetsChris&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49833.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:10:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49833</guid><dc:creator>joeyboygolf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49833.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49833</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The 4200 has the Beovision 1 chassis with a smaller screen. It has a picture quality to die for. Much more expensive than 4000/4002&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49816.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:39:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49816</guid><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49816.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49816</wfw:commentRss><description>Oh i was gonna say, go for the 4200, it has a flat screen was similar to the BeoVision 1 &lt;img src="http://forum.beoworld.org/emoticons/01.gif" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49811.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:24:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49811</guid><dc:creator>joeyboygolf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49811.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49811</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;There seems to be some confusion here!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 4002 is a later version of the 4000. The difference is that the 4002 has MASTERLINK&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49804.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:08:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49804</guid><dc:creator>Kim.t</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49804.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49804</wfw:commentRss><description>MX4002 is better&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49802.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49802</guid><dc:creator>deaddruid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49802.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49802</wfw:commentRss><description>Um...
There were two questions in that sentence. Which one is "no"?

Mark&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49791.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:38:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49791</guid><dc:creator>Kim.t</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49791.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49791</wfw:commentRss><description>No&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49789.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:33:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49789</guid><dc:creator>deaddruid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49789.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49789</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;So does that mean that the 4002 is superior to the 4000, or does the 4000 have an advantage in some other area?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Mark&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision MX4000 or MX4002</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49785.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:29:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:49785</guid><dc:creator>Kim.t</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/49785.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=49785</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Main diff is age and the fact that you can remote control an Avant/DVD/VCR in the main room if the MX4002 is connected with the Avant through RF- out on the Avant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can still listen to music in the MX4000 if it is connected to a MCL2AV&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>