<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Forum</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/13.aspx</link><description>The main Meeting Place for BeoWorld members, and the place for General Questions, Answers and things to say! 
If you have any questions about anything Bang &amp;amp; Olufsen related - please ask. If you have anything to say - please tell!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: Beosystem 3 + non-B&amp;O TV = workable option for smaller lounge room TV (but still B&amp;O link &amp; quality) ?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/279040.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:279040</guid><dc:creator>ToeKneeAus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/279040.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=279040</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;So no-one has opted for a BeoSystem 3 specifically to keep B&amp;amp;O link &amp;amp; quality but have smaller screen - guess that answers one of my questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To my other points :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Would the picture prowess of the Beosystem 3 be lost putting it through a 3rd party screen.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Also is the picture quality that different between a Beosystem 2 based BV7-32 &amp;amp; the newer Beosystem 3 based BV7-40 ?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anyone have an opinion they care to share ?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beosystem 3 + non-B&amp;O TV = workable option for smaller lounge room TV (but still B&amp;O link &amp; quality) ?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/278500.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:42:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:278500</guid><dc:creator>ToeKneeAus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/278500.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=278500</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;To enable my soul searching I even mocked up the BV7 32 (&amp;amp; 40) - the pic below has a BV10-40 poster stuck on a white board which has the dimensions of a BV7-32 screen (think i watched too much blue peter as a child).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="400" width="600" src="http://forum.beoworld.org/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.27.26/IMG_5F00_2112c.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... although you&amp;#39;ll notice the BV10-40 screen isn&amp;#39;t tall enough - it should run to the bottom of the white board.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you can see the BV mockup 7-40 is sooo much larger than a BV Avant 28&amp;quot; - but the saving grace is the stand which you can see through (unlike the TV in the wall Avant). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Its not an obvious choice for me - BV7-32 as the TV shouldn&amp;#39;t be the biggest thing in the room, or BV7-40 a better technology choice, or Beosystem 3 to give me integration and options for smaller screen from other manufacturers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes the single brand option approach (I don&amp;#39;t want to move away from B&amp;amp;O) throw up some difficult choices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other scary point is the many BV7 software scare stories (from Lee aswell) could put a potential purchaser off of a large (for me anyway) financial purchase...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Beosystem 3 + non-B&amp;O TV = workable option for smaller lounge room TV (but still B&amp;O link &amp; quality) ?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/278498.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:31:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:278498</guid><dc:creator>ToeKneeAus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/278498.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=278498</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m looking at BV7&amp;#39;s - I say plural as i think 32 is sizeable enough but am leaning towards a 40 to get the picture quality and &amp;#39;current technology&amp;#39; of the built in Beosystem 3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But this got me thinking - could I keep my small screen ideal by pairing a beosystem 3 with a non-B&amp;amp;O smaller tv. The drive to stay with B&amp;amp;O is to keep the link functionality working across the multiple rooms that I have beolink pc, BS4 &amp;amp; BV 1LS, but I want to explore the smaller screen options. Is this a barking mad suggestion ? Would the picture prowess of the Beosystem 3 be lost putting it through a 3rd party screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also is the picture quality that different between a Beosystem 2 based BV7-32 &amp;amp; the newer Beosystem 3 based BV7-40 ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having SWMBO given the green light to a tv purchase - i&amp;#39;m in a quandry, I don&amp;#39;t want a behemoth of a screen (the room is only 4m x 5.5 m) but i don&amp;#39;t want to purchase older tech and be disappointed when the BS gets software upgraded in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>