<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Forum</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/13.aspx</link><description>The main Meeting Place for BeoWorld members, and the place for General Questions, Answers and things to say! 
If you have any questions about anything Bang &amp;amp; Olufsen related - please ask. If you have anything to say - please tell!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166525.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:47:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166525</guid><dc:creator>csmager</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166525.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166525</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://forum.beoworld.org/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Puncher:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;The external dimensions given are 1061 x 651 which would give an outside diagonal dimension of ~49&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So it does.&amp;nbsp; I get an outside diagonal of 124.5cm, which is smaller than the quoted picture size.&amp;nbsp; I think it&amp;#39;s fairly safe to say this spec sheet isn&amp;#39;t very accurate!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166522.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:41:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166522</guid><dc:creator>Puncher</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166522.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166522</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://forum.beoworld.org/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;csmager:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Except for the fact that 126.9cm is 50&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; I suppose they could have merged two specs together!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The external dimensions given are 1061 x 651 which would give an outside diagonal dimension of ~49&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166513.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:12:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166513</guid><dc:creator>csmager</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166513.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166513</wfw:commentRss><description>Except for the fact that 126.9cm is 50&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; I suppose they could have merged two specs together!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166510.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166510</guid><dc:creator>Puncher</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166510.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166510</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe the specs. published on Beoworld&amp;#39;s product pages are for an (older) 42&amp;quot; panel driven by a BS2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166495.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:07:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166495</guid><dc:creator>csmager</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166495.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166495</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It has to be garbage.&amp;nbsp; The official spec sheet says it has a 1920x1080 pixel panel, which is capable of showing 1080p.&amp;nbsp; It can&amp;#39;t display 1080i without it first being bodged into 1080p by processing, so there&amp;#39;s no reason I can think of that they would have prevented it showing 1080p native.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bang-olufsen.com/UserFiles/File/ts/BeoVision4_en.pdf"&gt;http://www.bang-olufsen.com/UserFiles/File/ts/BeoVision4_en.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166493.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:55:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166493</guid><dc:creator>beodude</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166493.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166493</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you sure the Beovision 4 is progressive scan?. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Everywhere I have seen it listed it always says 1080i - interlaced eg on beoworld.co.uk product descriptions :&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;BeoVision 4 EU Specifications
&lt;br /&gt;Types: AUS 8965, EEU 896, F(GB) 896, GB-EXP 896, HK 8963, ITA 8964, A-B-D-E-N-NL-SF-S-EXP 8961, CH 8962, DK 8960
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Screen and picture when combined with Beosystem 1
&lt;br /&gt;Plasma display panel WXGA, HDTV ready
&lt;br /&gt;Diagonal picture size 126,9 cm
&lt;br /&gt;Aspect ratio 16:9 (wide-screen)
&lt;br /&gt;Front mounted contrast screen Anti-reflection coated glass
&lt;br /&gt;Scanning formats&lt;strong&gt; 480p, 1080i
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Picture display formats: Format 1: Panorama
&lt;br /&gt;Format 2: Letterbox zoom
&lt;br /&gt;Format 3: 16:9
&lt;br /&gt;Viewing comfort Electronic curtain
&lt;br /&gt;Picture format optimisation
&lt;br /&gt;Tint settings stored per channel
&lt;br /&gt;VisionClear Motion compensated progressive scan
&lt;br /&gt;Adaptive Luminance Peaking
&lt;br /&gt;Vertical peaking
&lt;br /&gt;Automatic skin tone correction
&lt;br /&gt;Specifications: Dimensions W x H x D
&lt;br /&gt;(Dimensions W x H x D including wall bracket 1061 x 651 x 100 mm) 1061 x 651 x 130 mm 
&lt;br /&gt;Weight 32&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is this info out of date or is it a just a typo?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166476.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:29:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166476</guid><dc:creator>csmager</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166476.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166476</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;LCD/Plasma screens either have enough pixels to display 720p or 1080p.&amp;nbsp; They can&amp;#39;t display 1080i formats natively, as that&amp;#39;s just not how they work.&amp;nbsp; If you feed a tv&amp;nbsp;an interlaced&amp;nbsp;signal, it will have to create a progressive one on the fly using two halves of a frame that&amp;nbsp;weren&amp;#39;t&amp;nbsp;processed to appear at exactly the same time - hence quick movement will look a bit rough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166459.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:16:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166459</guid><dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166459.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166459</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The BeoVision 4 is 1080p, both the 50" and the 65".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Beovision 4 progressive scan?</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166458.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:11:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:166458</guid><dc:creator>beodude</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/166458.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=166458</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I was just wondering if the bv4 will ever be upgraded to a full HD 1080p (progressive) panel or if it will be kept at a 1080i (interlaced) panel that uses the visionclear technology to try to compensate for the interlacing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To me it seems strange that B&amp;amp;O went down the route of using a 1080i in the first place, as the overall screen&amp;#39;s motion and picture quality will automatically be poorer than 1080p due to the difference between these 2 scanning modes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surely they can just use a better 1080p panel from pansonic, and do away with the visionclear technology that tries to compensate for the interlaced scanning?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Beodude&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>