<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Forum</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/13.aspx</link><description>The main Meeting Place for BeoWorld members, and the place for General Questions, Answers and things to say! 
If you have any questions about anything Bang &amp;amp; Olufsen related - please ask. If you have anything to say - please tell!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: BV4 - 50 vs BV4 -65</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159744.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:07:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:159744</guid><dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159744.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=159744</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;For SD, 6 times the height of the screen is best, although with HD, you can sit quite a bit closer. For 2.5m, I would say a BeoVision 4-50" is more appropriate, but I wouldn't want to use anything other than a BeoSystem 3, simply due to the way it handles HD...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: BV4 - 50 vs BV4 -65</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159661.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:10:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:159661</guid><dc:creator>akeithj</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159661.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=159661</wfw:commentRss><description>Can anyone please tell me if there is an optimum viweing distance?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: BV4 - 50 vs BV4 -65</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159445.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:03:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:159445</guid><dc:creator>kallasr</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159445.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=159445</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;That is very true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was going to get a 46&amp;quot; Screen, but with appr. 2,5 m viewing distance this is too big for SD (PAL/DVD) content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With HD (future broadcastings/blue-ray) there&amp;nbsp;is no problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ralf&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: BV4 - 50 vs BV4 -65</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159380.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:36:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:159380</guid><dc:creator>Karel Uyttendaele</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159380.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=159380</wfw:commentRss><description>It all depends on what you viewing distance will be...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: BV4 - 50 vs BV4 -65</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159349.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:39:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:159349</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159349.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=159349</wfw:commentRss><description>There shouldn&amp;#39;t be any difference, as long as they have the same age.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>BV4 - 50 vs BV4 -65</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159341.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:09:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:159341</guid><dc:creator>akeithj</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/159341.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=159341</wfw:commentRss><description>Does anyone know if there is any difference in picture quality between the BV4-50 and BV4-65?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>