<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Forum</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/13.aspx</link><description>The main Meeting Place for BeoWorld members, and the place for General Questions, Answers and things to say! 
If you have any questions about anything Bang &amp;amp; Olufsen related - please ask. If you have anything to say - please tell!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Re: Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102554.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:04:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:102554</guid><dc:creator>camshaft</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102554.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=102554</wfw:commentRss><description>Personally, past 1080p I&amp;#39;m really only interested in contrast and colors.&amp;nbsp; I can see this arena turning into the digital camera system, where cheap pocket cameras are now boasting about having over 9 megapixels, but what good is it through a little junk lens.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ll take an 8 megapixel digital slr over an 11 megapixel pocket camera, but the companies know how many average consumers just think that more mega pixels are better.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102539.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:41:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:102539</guid><dc:creator>Karel Uyttendaele</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102539.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=102539</wfw:commentRss><description>Try to find a wall where you can hang a 60&amp;quot;&amp;#39; screen and have sitting space in a normal living room!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102427.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:47:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:102427</guid><dc:creator>mbee</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102427.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=102427</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Noticeable doesn&amp;#39;t mean it will be a commercial success...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wasn&amp;#39;t it the BBC that claimed previously that 1080p wasn&amp;#39;t noticeable before 50&amp;quot;??? Don&amp;#39;t be fooled by pseudo scientific claims, believe what you see...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102424.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:102424</guid><dc:creator>Bingo</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102424.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=102424</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I have read a study from the BBC that Ultra HD is noticeable from 60 inch and larger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102394.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:33:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:102394</guid><dc:creator>mbee</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102394.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=102394</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Personnaly, you can only see the limits of 1080p picture in extremely large screens at a decent viewing distance. So unless you have an image wall with a touch surface, acting as a multipurpose display for your home (a la Microsoft Surface), in short : the final evolution of TV+computer+domotic+other, more than 1080p is not viable commercialy, as is the SACD for mass market. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If 4K is just for movies, like SACD for music, the market will be very small, a niche videophile market.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4K screens could be used for 3D viewing without special glasses with a lenticular system in order to create a great &amp;quot;more than 1080p&amp;quot; 3D picture, but that&amp;#39;s another story!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips</title><link>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102341.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:16:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41a2a90c-3a1e-4bd3-b144-3883695a7f38:102341</guid><dc:creator>Bingo</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/thread/102341.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archivedforum.beoworld.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=102341</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Ultra HD in 2011-2012 says Philips&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems Ultra-HDTV, predicted to be a technology that&amp;rsquo;s 15-20 years off, could be with us by 2011, or even sooner.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Philips has just showcased in Lisbon its latest thoughts on consumer electronics equipment, in particular its 9000 Series LCDs which claim performance specifications even better than the Philips Aurea range of stylish high-end &amp;ldquo;ambilight&amp;rdquo; and active frame products.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But senior staffers at Philips suggest this is only the start. Danny Tack, a Philips marketing director, spoke enthusiastically about next generation TVs and in particular what might follow 1080p displays, helped by upscaled Blu-Ray discs, and the work being done by NHK engineers in Japan on 4K devices. Questioned on when the first 4K displays might appear, and Tack admitted not in the next two or three years, but &amp;ldquo;by 2011, 2012. In Japan it could be next year.&amp;rdquo; &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nusurfen.nl/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL3JhcGlkdHZuZXdzLmNvbS9pbmRleC5waHAvdWx0cmEtaGQtaW4tMjAxMS0yMDEyLXNheXMtcGhpbGlwcy5odG1s" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;font color="#191970"&gt;http://rapidtvnews.com/index.php/ultra-hd-in-2011-2012-says-philips.html&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>