|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
-
-
-
The Beonic Man


- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Bath
- Posts 426

|
Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4. Simon.
"We can rebuild him. We have the technology."
7-40, 7-2, 9000, BS3, BC2, LC2, BC6000, Beo5
|
|
-
-
9 LEE


- Joined on 02-14-2007
- Moderator - UK
- Posts 5,223

|
The Beonic Man: Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4. Simon.
On saying that - if it looked nothing like, how did you assume it was modelled on a BeoCom 4 ?  
BeoWorld - Everything Bang & Olufsen
|
|
-
-
Dave


- Joined on 04-17-2007
- Brisbane, Australia
- Posts 2,328

|
Similar design concept though.
“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.”
Your health and well-being comes first and fore-most.
|
|
-
-
The Beonic Man


- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Bath
- Posts 426

|
9 LEE: The Beonic Man: Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4. Simon.
On saying that - if it looked nothing like, how did you assume it was modelled on a BeoCom 4 ?  
I anticipated someone asking me that Lee, it was the obvious response I suppose. My answer is that if you'd have to choose a B&O phone to compare then the only one to consider is the BeoCom 4, I mean it hardly resembles a BeoCom 2. Come on, do you honestly think that it is a copy of the BeoCom 4? We live in a world where so many innovations have been thought of its pretty difficult to come up with something without it very slightly looking like something else, but where do we stop if we start going down that route? Simon.
"We can rebuild him. We have the technology."
7-40, 7-2, 9000, BS3, BC2, LC2, BC6000, Beo5
|
|
-
-
-
-
Craig



- Joined on 03-29-2007
- Costa Del St Evenage
- Posts 4,855

|
Carol pointed this phone out to me a few Months ago on thr Argos website. Think it is a very lame attempt to copy a Beocom 4 IMO. Carol on the other hand quite likes it. Craig
For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals. Then
something happened which unleashed the power of our imagination. We
learned to talk and we learned to listen..
|
|
-
-
-
meandmyshadow


- Joined on 04-17-2007
- Posts 339

|
The Beonic Man: 9 LEE: The Beonic Man: Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4. Simon.
On saying that - if it looked nothing like, how did you assume it was modelled on a BeoCom 4 ?  
I anticipated someone asking me that Lee, it was the obvious response I suppose. My answer is that if you'd have to choose a B&O phone to compare then the only one to consider is the BeoCom 4, I mean it hardly resembles a BeoCom 2. Come on, do you honestly think that it is a copy of the BeoCom 4? We live in a world where so many innovations have been thought of its pretty difficult to come up with something without it very slightly looking like something else, but where do we stop if we start going down that route? Simon.
It looks more than slightly like it, did you look at the larger image? It is a direct copy (a very poor one) of the Beocom 4 design, a cylindrical concept split down the middle to give a base station and seperate handset. How is that not like the Beocom 4?
|
|
-
-
The Beonic Man


- Joined on 04-16-2007
- Bath
- Posts 426

|
To be honest I did not click the picture to enlarge it I simply went on the smaller one provided. OK, it looks a little bit like it I agree, but I think that is only because you are looking for it too. I have seen many other phones in all the popular electronic shops that are based on a design like that. BT used to make (and perhaps still do) loads of upstanding phones, I used to have several. Its like I said earlier, in this day and age its pretty difficult to design something without it looking in part like an exisiting product somewhere on the planet. Why would Binatone of all companies try and copy a BeoCom 4 anyway? They would have no agenda for doing so. The BeoCom 4 is hardly a best seller in the phone range, why not imitate the BeoCom 6000 or the BeoCom 2? I don't buy it. Simon.
"We can rebuild him. We have the technology."
7-40, 7-2, 9000, BS3, BC2, LC2, BC6000, Beo5
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
|
|
|