in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 12-05-2007 4:05 PM by The Beonic Man. 10 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 12-04-2007 9:01 AM

    What next?

    We have all seen some really bad & lazy copies of B&O over the years - remember that awful copy of a Bsnd 9000 Ick!.

    Well now Binatone have gone and done this.....

    Binatone Tempero No - thumbs down

  • 12-04-2007 9:24 AM In reply to

    Re: What next?

    Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4.

    Simon. 

    "We can rebuild him. We have the technology." 7-40, 7-2, 9000, BS3, BC2, LC2, BC6000, Beo5
  • 12-04-2007 9:31 AM In reply to

    • 9 LEE
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 02-14-2007
    • Moderator - UK
    • Posts 5,223
    • Founder

    Re: What next?

    The Beonic Man:

    Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4.

    Simon. 

    On saying that - if it looked nothing like, how did you assume it was modelled on a BeoCom 4 ?

    LaughingLaughing

    BeoWorld - Everything Bang & Olufsen

  • 12-04-2007 9:34 AM In reply to

    • Dave
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-17-2007
    • Brisbane, Australia
    • Posts 2,328
    • Bronze Member

    Re: What next?

    Similar design concept though.

    “Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.”

    Your health and well-being comes first and fore-most.

     

     

  • 12-04-2007 9:38 AM In reply to

    Re: What next?

    9 LEE:
    The Beonic Man:

    Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4.

    Simon. 

    On saying that - if it looked nothing like, how did you assume it was modelled on a BeoCom 4 ?

    LaughingLaughing

    I anticipated someone asking me that Lee, it was the obvious response I suppose. My answer is that if you'd have to choose a B&O phone to compare then the only one to consider is the BeoCom 4, I mean it hardly resembles a BeoCom 2. Come on, do you honestly think that it is a copy of the BeoCom 4? We live in a world where so many innovations have been thought of its pretty difficult to come up with something without it very slightly looking like something else, but where do we stop if we start going down that route?

    Simon.

    "We can rebuild him. We have the technology." 7-40, 7-2, 9000, BS3, BC2, LC2, BC6000, Beo5
  • 12-04-2007 9:50 AM In reply to

    • Tom
    • Top 25 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Luxembourg
    • Posts 3,175
    • Bronze Member

    Re: What next?

    I hope for the company that this was not meant to be a BeoCom4 copy. If it was, then they absolutely should fire the "designer" Laughing

    Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life. - Berthold Auerbach

  • 12-04-2007 12:14 PM In reply to

    • Alex
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • Bath & Cardiff, UK
    • Posts 2,990
    • Bronze Member

    Re: What next?

    The basic shape is the same, but I don't think anybody is going to think they've got the same as B&O with one of those...

     Weekly top artists:                   

  • 12-04-2007 1:44 PM In reply to

    • Craig
    • Top 10 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 03-29-2007
    • Costa Del St Evenage
    • Posts 4,855
    • Founder

    Re: What next?

    Carol pointed this phone out to me a few Months ago on thr Argos website. Think it is a very lame attempt to copy a Beocom 4 IMO. Carol on the other hand quite likes it.Erm

     

    CraigSmile

    For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals. Then something happened which unleashed the power of our imagination. We learned to talk and we learned to listen..

  • 12-04-2007 2:23 PM In reply to

    • Jez
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 06-13-2007
    • Posts 150
    • Bronze Member

    Re: What next?

    Concept is exact rip off of BeoCom 4, design is different in that it is cheap in looks and probably performance too. Looks more like a shaver.
  • 12-05-2007 4:37 AM In reply to

    Re: What next?

    The Beonic Man:
    9 LEE:
    The Beonic Man:

    Personally, I don't think that looks anything like a B&O phone. I am not sure what comparison you are making but if its the BeoCom 4 then I can't see any similarities at all. The screen size is much smaller, the base is bulkier and quite different, the buttons don't resemble the BeoCom 4 at all and the tall traingular shape is nothing like that of the BeoCom 4.

    Simon. 

    On saying that - if it looked nothing like, how did you assume it was modelled on a BeoCom 4 ?

    LaughingLaughing

    I anticipated someone asking me that Lee, it was the obvious response I suppose. My answer is that if you'd have to choose a B&O phone to compare then the only one to consider is the BeoCom 4, I mean it hardly resembles a BeoCom 2. Come on, do you honestly think that it is a copy of the BeoCom 4? We live in a world where so many innovations have been thought of its pretty difficult to come up with something without it very slightly looking like something else, but where do we stop if we start going down that route?

    Simon.

    It looks more than slightly like it, did you look at the larger image?  It is a direct copy (a very poor one) of the Beocom 4 design, a cylindrical concept split down the middle to give a base station and seperate handset.  How is that not like the Beocom 4?Stick out tongue

  • 12-05-2007 4:05 PM In reply to

    Re: What next?

    To be honest I did not click the picture to enlarge it I simply went on the smaller one provided. OK, it looks a little bit like it I agree, but I think that is only because you are looking for it too. I have seen many other phones in all the popular electronic shops that are based on a design like that. BT used to make (and perhaps still do) loads of upstanding phones, I used to have several. Its like I said earlier, in this day and age its pretty difficult to design something without it looking in part like an exisiting product somewhere on the planet. Why would Binatone of all companies try and copy a BeoCom 4 anyway? They would have no agenda for doing so. The BeoCom 4 is hardly a best seller in the phone range, why not imitate the BeoCom 6000 or the BeoCom 2? I don't buy it.

    Simon.

    "We can rebuild him. We have the technology." 7-40, 7-2, 9000, BS3, BC2, LC2, BC6000, Beo5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)