in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 03-13-2009 7:23 AM by beologisch. 7 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (8 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 03-12-2009 7:10 AM

    Ideal flat screen size

    What do U think is the ideal flat screen size for bigger rooms? 32, 40, 50, 65, more?

  • 03-12-2009 7:28 AM In reply to

    • fridsten
    • Top 500 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 04-17-2007
    • Stockholm, Sweden
    • Posts 167
    • Founder

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    That depends on the viewing distance, yourself, what you're watching, etc.

    If you're decorating your room for movie worshipping, then bigger is always better. If you're just watching the news, you'd be fine with a smaller screen. We have a Beovision 6-26 in our living room, with a viewing distance of around 2 to 4 meters. It would be nice with a 32" screen for movies, but it's not too small. Then our living room is mainly intended for socialising, not a cinematic experience. Which is also why I don't have surround sound or even connected the telly to the stereo, by the way.

    What's the main purpouse of the screen in your case?

  • 03-12-2009 7:46 AM In reply to

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    You can use this online calculator here to get some guidance, but do go to the shop to see if that matches your viewing preferences.

    Cheers,
    Frank

  • 03-12-2009 9:09 AM In reply to

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    About 5 m of viewing distance.

  • 03-12-2009 10:00 AM In reply to

    • steph
    • Top 100 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-16-2007
    • France
    • Posts 612
    • Bronze Member

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    I think the "BeoLiving" idea is very good.

    A small screen for the programs like news, tv series, ... and a hidden projector and sreen for the cinematic experience.

    The main screen could be a 32" or 40" (OK for your viewing distance) and with the hidden projector and big screen, you don't transform your living room in a "showroom theatre".

    I think it's a very clever solution because i think the everyday programs can't have a really good quality on a very big size (50", 65",...).

    You get often black bars because lots of programs are not 16/9 and lots of are SD.

    The only problem is that you must find a good location for the projector, must be in front of the screen and hidden. And find a solution to hide the cables.

  • 03-13-2009 1:35 AM In reply to

    • kawo
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 04-17-2007
    • Posts 516
    • Founder

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    from my point of view it is all about viewing distance and video quality. HD Blu Ray content is fine on a 50" screen with only 2,5 m viewing distance, poor analoge cable in SD you better sit 4m away...

    I have a 50" screen and the viewing distance is 3,70m. For TV SD is OK, but for DVD it could be larger. For the "big screen" I have a projector with a 100" screen, SD TV is really bad, but Blu Ray could even be bigger....especially with 21:9 format 

    _________________________________________________________________________

    BV4-50, Beosystem 3, Beolab 5, Beolab 3, BV3-32, BV1, BS9000, Beolab 4, Beolab 2000, Beo4 Cinema

  • 03-13-2009 6:43 AM In reply to

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    I think the link is there to support the home theatre dream pushing bigger and bigger monitors.

    I think anyone with a 4m x 4m living room would consider themselves fortunate and with a larger than average room. Putting the recommended 100 incher in there I think is sad.

    It is to my mind all about compromise of living space, TV space etc... I would have suggested a 40 to 50 incher more than adequate.

    But hey!....I could be the minority?

     

    10%

  • 03-13-2009 7:23 AM In reply to

    Re: Ideal flat screen size

    Mr10Percent:

    I think the link is there to support the home theatre dream pushing bigger and bigger monitors.

    I think anyone with a 4m x 4m living room would consider themselves fortunate and with a larger than average room. Putting the recommended 100 incher in there I think is sad.

    It is to my mind all about compromise of living space, TV space etc... I would have suggested a 40 to 50 incher more than adequate.

    But hey!....I could be the minority?

    10%

    You're not alone...........;-) but could still be the minority...........:-)

    Our livingroom is just what it says : a room to live in and not just a TV room with a big black wall in it [and I can't even hang e.g. a painting on it, so black will just be all dull black] for I use my audio during may hours a day, but video for just a few hours. too big toot large too black for my taste and interiour.

     

    Leon: Beoworld's First "First Prize" winner. "Carpe Diem et Dolce Far Niente"
Page 1 of 1 (8 items)