in Search
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Latest post 10-23-2011 4:20 AM by f5434964. 0 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (1 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 10-23-2011 4:20 AM

    caller id beocom 6000/2500

    0 false 21 18 pt 18 pt 0 0 false false false /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

    As a owner of Beocom 6000 and 2500 I just found out that the Beocom 2500 - which is the OLDER product - offers more options regarding CLIP than the newer Beocom 6000! Particularly I'm talking about following situation: both telefones are showing the caller id/number (CLIP); furthermore I have the option "Call waiting" - so there is a signal that while talking to person A indicates that someone is calling me too; I think most of us have these options nowadays!

    Now my question: while my Beocom 2500 is showing the number of the second call Beocom 6000 does not!

    Why does the older phone offer a better software than the newer one?

    I use Beocom 6000 Mk1 - maybe a software update would fix this issue?

    Regards Elmar 

Page 1 of 1 (1 items)