|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Latest post 12-29-2010 5:45 PM by yiancar. 11 replies.
-
10-31-2010 2:38 AM
|
|
-
yiancar
- Joined on 10-24-2009
- Posts 7
|
MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
Hey guys, I am building a phono amp for my favorite beogram 2000. It includes a MMC4 cartage and its time to adjust the pickup load on the preamp. The input resistance is 47K ohms, thats for sure. However the capacitance is killing me, Beoworld product page recommend 220pf, I have read 100pf or 400pf in other places. The preamp is now working with 470pf, as you guys are much more experienced than me, shall i change it?
Yiangos :)
|
|
-
-
tournedos
- Joined on 12-08-2007
- Finland
- Posts 5,808
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
For the earlier MMC20 series the correct capacitance was 220 pF, so perhaps try with something smaller than 470. But in the end, let your ears decide!
|
|
-
-
yiancar
- Joined on 10-24-2009
- Posts 7
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
Tnx :) just orders some 220pf caps. I will try a 220in one channel and 470 in the other so I will be able to decide which is better . Am going to post my results later:)
|
|
-
-
chartz
- Joined on 07-20-2009
- Burgundy
- Posts 984
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
Hi,
Just to make your decision a little harder, I use 330 pF...
|
|
-
-
yiancar
- Joined on 10-24-2009
- Posts 7
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
Oh another cap to test! Just a quick one, how does the sound gets as capacitance is decreased?
|
|
-
-
chartz
- Joined on 07-20-2009
- Burgundy
- Posts 984
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
yiancar:
Oh another cap to test! Just a quick one, how does the sound gets as capacitance is decreased?
Well usually the response falls down, resulting in a dull top-end. But on some cartridges, the increase gives a horrible lift at about 10 kHz with makes up for a livelier, but more tiring sound. Experimenting is the only way to find out. With B&O MMC series, I settled for 330 pF, although B&O goes for 220pF which gives a flat response, lacking a little in life for my tastes. With SMMC 20EN 220pF is just right! With a Goldring 1022, I also increased the load to 56k to flatten the response.
A can of worms, this.
|
|
-
-
-
yiancar
- Joined on 10-24-2009
- Posts 7
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
Guys just realised that i made a huge mistake, in my original trt i used 4700pf insted of 470pf, thats why it sounded so bassy and dead :), Tomorow I will try the 220pf . I also couldent find any 330pf with <5% tolerance :(
|
|
-
-
chartz
- Joined on 07-20-2009
- Burgundy
- Posts 984
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
yiancar:
Guys just realised that i made a huge mistake, in my original trt I used 4700pf instead of 470pf
Oh dear, it must have sounded dreadful!
|
|
-
-
-
yachadm
- Joined on 06-24-2007
- Jerusalem, Israel
- Posts 687
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
In order of preference, make sure you use NP0 or C0G MLCC ceramic caps, for experimentation. They are the most stable of the "cheap" capacitors. Murata or TDK here.
Once you've decided on the correct value, you can install Polypropylene film caps of the same value for added smoothness in sound. Try Wima, Nichicon or Panasonic here.
Menahem
Learn from the mistakes of others - you'll not live long enough to make them all yourself!
|
|
-
-
yiancar
- Joined on 10-24-2009
- Posts 7
|
Re: MMC 4 loads , Extremly confused preamp
Finally guys . the amp is cased up and fully working . I settled with the 220pf and some wima caps. It sounds very very full and balance i can say. Also the RIAA curve of the amp must be dead accurate as the pops have soften out.
Thank you for all the knowlage you gave me :)
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (12 items)
|
|
|