One of my setups is an old Beocenter 9500 with a pair of Beolab 8000. The Beocenter is installed in the first part of a large L-shaped room, so when I am in the second part of the room the remote control IR signal does not reach the Beocenter at all. Note that I usually start the Beocenter from standby when I am in the first part of the room, and when I am in the second part of the room I mainly need to remote control the volume.
I guess I need an additional IR sensor in the second part of the room. However the Beocenter 9500 has no connection for an external IR sensor (unlike e.g. the Beomaster 7000). Therefore I intend to adapt this setup as follows:
- keep the Beolab 8000 connected to the Beocenter 9500, as is currently the case;
- add a MCL2A (without a second pair of speakers) and install the MCL2A's IR sensor in the second part of the room.
In this case:
- I will be able to fully remote control the Beocenter from the second part of the room, including the volume (as the volume commands through the MCL2A typically impact the volume of the main room speakers);
- however, I will be able to start the Beocenter from standby either directly or remotely from the first part of the room, but not from the second part of the room (because it will be as if I am in a Link room and the Beolab will be muted), but I have no problem with that.
Now, I have two questions:
- do you have any better setup idea?
- obviously I should use the old MCL2A's rectangle-shaped IR sensor, but could I use a current round-shaped sensor instead in order to use the built-in volume buttons in addition to the IR sensor functionality? Would that work?
Thank you for your advice. Cheers, js