Agree Watch .... mmm I have new plan in this field. But this is not place for this discussion

you must admit that more exiting is to burn 7995 e on 0.95 than 1000 to 1.2

sorry ... it is 50mm f 0.95 Allmighty 0.95 http://us.leica-camera.com/photography/m_system/lenses/5915.html

[quote user="bayerische"]Yes, 35mm it is. [/quote] 1.4, 1.2 or maybe 1.095 ? Turning on Nikon system I forgot how good Leica is of course there is some credits to guy behind camera best

probably would be expensive, heavy, fork-knife spoon with magnet for toothpick and on the end it will look absolutely stunning and I will be the first one in the line to get it, even I know it's ridiculously expensive and not functional at all

DA ! that's the soul of Leica 35mm 1.4 ?

tell me Andreas ! Was it Leica ?

[quote user="TheMajor"] Can I ask how are you connecting the subs? [/quote] Din to rca, but on my BC1 I have digital back with sub out, in this case tv control sub, which I think is ok. Alen you are totally right, but I think that every sub from 500-1000 e can be good enough to blow BL11 away. And, sorry to say, BL11 is really awful

As I said above, I never listen music with sub's and my idea was to compare every aspect of sound quality from low to hi end. So in order to hear good stuff I need to listen some of the bad one. I take it like a little experiment. I know "money=quality" but in the terms of sub's I think you can get really more for less. For example

I said to myself I wont be stubborn anymore :) and made deal with my friend who run's HI END shop to take couple of non B&O sub's to try ... We made a deal, he will give me 3-4 sub's ( different quality and price range ) to try for couple of days. First one is cheep Yamaha, which determine my statement that sub is not good for music