Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Search

Page 9 of 65 (649 items) « First ... < Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next > ... Last »
  • Re: The B&O problem?

    Alex: erg4000: I have a Beosystem 3 / BV4 50" setup at home. Besides the versatile Beosystem 3, I don't see why my next display should be from B&O. I understand that B&O has no plasma or LCD development and that companies like Sony don't want to sell their newest LCD or OLED displays to B&O. Sony don't make their own LCD
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 12-09-2008
  • Re: The B&O problem?

    RussR: kokomo: You may well be correct with your math(s), but I can assure you 65" TVs are not what your 'normal' consumer is in the market for, at least in Europe so the comparison, whilst it may be accurate, is somewhat irrelevant. Have you noticed a recession? Maybe even a depression? Ford, Chrysler & GM are virtually bankrupt. OK
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 12-08-2008
  • Re: The B&O problem?

    Puncher: TripEnglish: Beauty, integration, sound quality (it did have a BeoLab 7 now didn't it) to name a few. It can still integrate with a BeoSound, still work in a link room, still blow the doors off its contemporaries in just about every way. Still rotates and tilts on its stand by remote. What does a 3 year old Sony do but encourage me to replace
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 12-07-2008
  • Re: BV7 40 MKIII / SW 4.24 problem

    moxxey: Hey, my dealer only answers a select few emails about the BV7-40 sw ;) Since buying the BV7-40 MKIII in Dec 2007, here are my major sw issues: 1) Problem with the white flash with Blu-ray players and the PS3 in 1080p mode. Fixed with sw 4.24a. Annoying, but not as bad as... 2) Problem with BV7-40 crashing to 'off' in July 2008, after
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 12-02-2008
  • beosound 5

    What is the verdict so far from those that have seen it. Played with a dealer version today- £3650 seems a lot of cash and from what I can gather 3 wires to the unit for video and audio content which is a pity
    Posted to BeoSound 5 Forum (Forum) by 355f on 11-24-2008
  • Re: BV7-40mk3 vs original BV9 mk1 720p

    'This post is going the same way as the HD audio thread. Everyone 'misunderstands ' apart from you of course! Will leave you to your own interpretation of the facts razlaw. Enjoy your class leading bv7 LOL
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-24-2008
  • Re: BV7-40mk3 vs original BV9 mk1 720p

    Razlaw: moxxey: Razlaw: As for price, subtract the price of a Beosystem 3 from the price of a BV7, then subtract the price of a high quality DVD player I don't go along with that argument. The Beosystem 3 is way overpriced. You can't really just say 'take off the price..' and then it becomes a 'bargain'. What does the Beosystem
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-24-2008
  • Re: BV7-40mk3 vs original BV9 mk1 720p

    moxxey: Razlaw: As for price, subtract the price of a Beosystem 3 from the price of a BV7, then subtract the price of a high quality DVD player I don't go along with that argument. The Beosystem 3 is way overpriced. You can't really just say 'take off the price..' and then it becomes a 'bargain'. What does the Beosystem 3 do
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-24-2008
  • Re: BV7-40mk3 vs original BV9 mk1 720p

    moxxey: Oh 355f, we are going to disagree, once again :) Although the BV9 is superb, myself and others agree that the reds in any plasma image are too deep for the picture and a good quality LCD (think BV7-40) will show them more naturally. I agree that some HD pictures can be a little 'pixel perfect' on the BV7-40 and can look more smoothed
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-23-2008
  • Re: BV7-40mk3 vs original BV9 mk1 720p

    KingOfSnake: 355f having said that, the BV7-40 MKIII Picture is not bad at all IMHO, but I would go with his reasoning and I prefer Plasma generally. I fully agree with you but for £9050 is -'not bad' accetable!
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-23-2008
Page 9 of 65 (649 items) « First ... < Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next > ... Last »