I present, the Kravitz BL5.

I love how the CFO is power-focusing on not making the least little movement while the CEO is speaking. Good to see that things are pointing upwards again.

And Atkinson's tentative suggestion, that this was done to make the SACD sound better than the CD, is also "interesting".

[quote user="beoaus"] Well after buying the original record, CD, aniversary edition of DSOTM, the last packs the largest punch by a mile. At least to my ears. ..beoaus. [/quote] Yes, that's what they're also commenting in the article linked above - the volume has been boosted, but you can also do that using the volume adjuster on your

My apologies. I forgot to add the link: http://www.stereophile.com/news/11649/

A Swedish Audio Society have created free software that will help you check your music, to see how it's been mastered. What the graphs show, is how much headroom for dynamic span there is in the music, between the softest and the most powerful portions. If everything's been compressed and pushed to the ceiling (solid black bars), then there

DSOTM is actually quite restrained compared to the absolutely best recordings out there for dynamics. It's worth being aware that remasters and more recent releases don't tell the original story, though. Here's a comparison between the CD-layer and the SACD-layers of the 2003 Capitol release: Harvest by Neil Young is quite good if you want

The Analogue Department thought the Beogram 3000 was worthy of inclusion in their gallery. http://www.theanalogdept.com/s_leikanger.htm Do have a look at the other turntables and resources at that site.

I'm so pleased with my new turntable that I have to "flash" it here! Restored by Classic Audio in Denmark and playing wonderful music.

Here's a shot that does justice to the work Frede's done. I chose a red label as it feels like Christmas here!