|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
Thanks for looking! [quote user="burantek"] Also, are the pulley(s) missing for the transit drive? (last of the new pics). [/quote] Sorry, what do you mean?
-
Hi, If you can be bothered having a look here , more pics.
-
Yes but most probably the ±3 dB is a typo error though! ±0.3 dB sounds more like it from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, the useful bandwidth. 100kHz is irrelevant anyway, because we can't hear much past 15 kHz, and 10 Hz is also anecdotical! I'm sure the lesser model will be fine as well.
-
[quote user="burantek"] However, the 4000 is the ultimate B&o table and is a MUST for any "collection." [/quote] That's the reason why I MUST, HAVE TO, WILL own one!
-
You don't need to call Sherwood at all. It WILL work, I guarantee! I take it for granted that your RX2 has RCA (Cinch) plugs for the amp of course, since you had an NAD.
-
[quote user="DanDaMan"] • Input sensitivity, 47 kΩ Phono(MM) .................................................................... 2.5 mV [/quote]It will fit alright, go ahead!
-
Victory! The Sherwood HAS a phono input so it'll work right out of the box! http://www.sherwoodusa.com/prod_rx5502.html
-
I'm not too worried because I have recently worked on a white 4002 which now works great (it was broken when I got it for 50€), so I think I got the basics. But the 4000 looks more complicated electronically... and mechanically! Oh well let's take the plunge!
-
Thanks Jaff. Anyone else ? What about the arm then? Knackered or not?
-
Hello everyone, I am about to buy this thing here: I've already asked Martin, but I'd like your opinions too, especially since I can't see it "in the flesh". It is sold non-working of course. The arm carriage looks askew... The owner assures me it was in his family, he just inherited it, which I believe. He wants 100 €.
|
|
|