|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
I'd love for Tournedos and saf to take us through their reasoning in a detailed manner, but I do not see why not winning should have any relevance. @Lee. 120x100/550=21.82% 21.82x4.58=99.93 I'm sure that if you gave us the third decimal, we'd get very close -- not proving anything if the reasoning is wrong, but I don't think it is. The
-
I'd get thrown out of the casino if I tried those complicated scribbles. 120x100/550=21.8%
-
Yes. I know my suggestion seems way too simplistic, but you can't aggregate the odds relative to the number of draws, without also aggregating the number of "drawees." And that would be 550x12=6600. Which means you're back where you started, really. And this is why it comes down to the very prosaic 120/550. (And for each double or
-
I always find probabilities paradoxical. But in this case, since no member is eliminated after winning, the odds of winning remain 1/550 for each draw (if there are no additional Gold members); and the odds of winning a prize after a year of draws, are 120/550, if we have only unique winners. The distribution of actual winners will vary, of course,
-
B&O went up in tune with the increasing availability of easy credit, and crashed when that stopped being available, just like most things in the segment. One could claim that in the feeding frenzy period, when people were throwing money at everthing premium and willingly paying a lot, B&O didn't get the pay-off one would expect, as the share
-
Movies today are mixed for a surround experience, so you should consider having speakers in the surrounds. The question is what speakers, and how much should you spend on them. A good way of deciding is to set up your source (in this case the BV7) properly, and connect a pair of loudspeakers to the surround connections. Disconnect your front speakers
-
I don't own a Beomaster 1200, Beogram 1200 and Beocord 1200 - and still think they're outstanding. But am also a great fan of the 9500. JJ was an inspired designer.
-
From BeoWorld - on designers. JJ gets the 9500, as well. Jacob Jensen Beocenter 1500 Beocenter 7000 Beocenter 9000 Beocenter 9500 (iF Winner 1990) Beocord 1600 Beocord 1800 Beocord 2400 Beocord 5000 Beogram 1000 Beogram 1200 Beogram 1800 Beogram 4002/4004 Beogram 4000 BeoLab 5000 Beolit 1000 Beolit 400 Beolit 600 (iF Winner 1970) Beomaster 1200 (iF
-
This is really hard. Because there's a lot to choose from. Beogram 4000 is outstanding. And the family of turntables derived from that remains beautiful. Yet I agree with the Jarman brothers who ask whether the Beogram 1200 isn't the most beautiful record player ever, in their book on collecting B&O. And combine that with a Beomaster 1200
-
Shorter version (I've received a few queries, and the above is clearly too dense!) The trick below may work with various B&O audiomasters, not just the Beomaster 6500/7000. I use all three connectors on my BL5s: PL, RCA LINE IN, COAX S/PDIF. The PL goes to a Beomaster 6500, which I set up to listen to radio broadcasts and for other sources.
|
|
|