Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Search

Page 51 of 65 (649 items) « First ... < Previous 49 50 51 52 53 Next > ... Last »
  • Re: BV7-40 Mark II v BV7-40 Mark III

    Beolab: No 355f !! Its all about the back-lightening on a LCD. ;) 50% of the PQ is the back-lightening, 20% is the video engine/processor and 30% is the panel if you didn't now that.... Regards Since when has one heard of the panel being seperated from the backlight!-its one and the same thing, It is classed as a unit. So when for example an LCD
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-22-2007
  • Re: BV7-40 Mark II v BV7-40 Mark III

    The Beonic Man: moxxey: Hrm, they've not bothered to tell me they've got one set up! As I've mentioned many times, Sky HD on my old MKI panel is still, in my and many other people's opinion, outstanding. Certain programmes on BBC HD are stunning and seem without flaws. Yes, the panel could be brighter and the contrast improved, but the
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-21-2007
  • Re: Product called 'Light Manager' for Beo4

    The Beonic Man: 355f: And it works fine with plasma, as many zones as you want- fades in and fades out- all adjustable! Could you post a couple of pictures for me so I can see exactly what equipment I need to ask for? I will almost certainly do it with a floor stand as you have because I have recently finished decorating the house so I won't be
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-20-2007
  • Re: Product called 'Light Manager' for Beo4

    And it works fine with plasma, as many zones as you want- fades in and fades out- all adjustable!
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-20-2007
  • Re: Product called 'Light Manager' for Beo4

    why not just order lintronic for B&O if your in UK can give you a good contact that will supply at a favourable price. I have mine as a freestanding unit on the floor controlling the lights as i did not want to sink it into the wall. Fat better solution - albeit more expensive than messing about with this product!
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-20-2007
  • Re: Beo 5 + non B&O equipment

    Sebastien: Hi, did anybody manage to get the Beo 5 to work with non B&O equipment? Thanks, S.F
    Posted to The Beo5 & Beo6 Remote Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-19-2007
  • Re: Beovision 7 verses 9

    TerryM: I have always been given to understand that Manufacturers' quoted Contrast Ratios have been found to be grossly optimistic when the relevent TV has been tested in the lab. Does B & O quote realistic data? The BV7 Mk111 would have to be a significant improvement over the Mk11,which I found to be disappointing in it's PQ,to sway me
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-17-2007
  • Re: Beovision 7 verses 9

    It depends hows its been meansured have a look here---- Contrast ratio is the difference between the brightest and darkest parts of an image, measured in discrete steps, at any given moment. Generally, the higher the contrast ratio, the more realistic the image is. Contrast ratios for plasma displays are often advertised as high as 20,000:1. On the
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-17-2007
  • Re: Beovision 7 verses 9

    Its great that your happy with the BV7 and that one considers it such a leap in LCD panel and technology that it renders all known LCD issues defunct. This will be of great comfort to the manufacturers of LCD Lets leave it at that- its all down to personal preference at the end of the day and human nature dictates that once a purchase has been made
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by 355f on 10-17-2007
Page 51 of 65 (649 items) « First ... < Previous 49 50 51 52 53 Next > ... Last »