|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
Why she's on the Wedthred© of course!
-
Success! It was obviously just the normal posting issue, although you don't get any sort of "error" message when the post hasn't succeeded. Anyhoo - well done Phil, nice work!
-
-
Any reason why this wouldn't work with an old 2G model - I've tried twice and my post hasn't made it! (or is it just the now "normal" posting issues)?
-
-
[quote user="DoubleU"] Just a Cambridge for an Express? Hmm, not sure if I would do that... I would trade the Express for the Squeezebox Touch. It has a very good DAC, a really good review from the critical Stereophile magazine: http://www.stereophile.com/computeraudio//logitech_squeezebox_touch_network_music_player/ and has a lot more to
-
Nowt much - Panny plasma, Sky box, PS3, iPod 5.5G 30Gb (full up and needing a rethink) and Sennheiser CX300 ear canal 'phones. I use these more than my A8's, they give much better sound isolation and are a lot less faff fitting on etc and don't interfere with my specs (and I find I have to keep re-tweaking the A8's cos, like all ear
-
[quote user="BeoFab"] ............................. You don't get a fifth place of the coolest brands in UK without people knowing about the brand and even better thinking that is "cool", even in a market where the sales went down 27%................................. [/quote] While I don't disagree with a lot of what you've
-
[quote user="vikinger"] According to this report B&O is viewed as the 5th coolest brand in the UK.The list seems to be an odd mix of brands and individual brand models. 1. Aston Martin 2.Apple iPhone 3. Apple iPod 4.RIM Blackberry 5. B&O 6. Harley-Davidson 7. Nintendo Wii 8. Google Graham [/quote] By who I wonder?? According to THIS
-
[quote user="TripEnglish"] [quote user="Puncher"] [quote user="PhilLondon"]It is a great feature. Strange that they charge for it... [/quote] Really? Seems on par to me - charge people (too much) for everything (updates that correct faults etc.)! [/quote] Actually makes good sense. The feature cost a lot to develop and
|
|
|