Definitely! I;ll give you your f now as I trust you!

That is the quad one. S60s are recommended but P45s have the advantage of taking up less space! RLs would be fine but remember that the 6000 is not the most powerful amplifier in the range. S45-2s work well - I used four of them and and was pleased with the result. Not too big!

I think I can guarantee that any founder member who loses their status due to oversight will not have to worry! If it is any consolation, I lost mine for a couple of days!!

I have had both and in an older system, the CDX is more useful. Clearly if you have a 4500 system, go for bthe 4500.

In my view, not adequately. For a room this big, I would suggest you need a better system. You need more bass to fill that size of room - an Ouverture with some speakers - the 4000s would be a minimum in my view.

Don't turn it up too loud! S120s would be better.

Chris just sold a mint one with speakers and remote for £90.

The major difference is that the CDX is 14 bit 4x over sampling and the 4500 is 16 bit 2x over sampling. The CDX also has more controls on it but the 4500 has datalink.

Agree! Luckily they don't quite do the watch I want! The Calatrava with the Roman numerals and a sweep second hand in an automatic! The closest is the 5119R - not automatic!

beopaul: Peter : Do you use Dolby C? The major disadvantage of the deck is not that, but the inability to set the recording level oneself. Although the B&O automatic record level was not as bad as some, it was still not great! The 9500 does at least have an over ride even if the VU metering is pretty basic. Recording level IS manually adjustable