Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Search

Page 37 of 777 (7761 items) « First ... < Previous 35 36 37 38 39 Next > ... Last »
  • Re: Beogram comparison

    The SP12 is superb. I am not convinced that B&O cartridges really got much better - just a lot smaller and neater. The only thing about the 1200 series is that the isolation from sound and vibration is not nearly as good as the later decks. I would tend to use a wall bracket.
    Posted to BeoWorld North America (Forum) by Peter on 04-08-2011
  • Re: Beogram 8002 - no damped lowering of the arm

    I remember it being faster than the 4000 but not uncontrolled. Maybe my house is colder!
    Posted to BeoGram (Forum) by Peter on 04-08-2011
  • Re: Beogram 3000 at the Used Record Store

    I would wait till it has a JVC and Akai on top as well and is $50! It will be on the bottom because it is the heaviest! The lid can take it! I remember my dealer showing me how strong the 4000 lid was by standing on it!
    Posted to BeoGram (Forum) by Peter on 04-08-2011
  • Re: Beogram comparison

    [quote user="Evan"] @ Peter, I've never lived with a record deck before so I might not have noticed the inconvenience since I'm not used to it! Plus I bet I would hardly use one even if I had it. Also, I feel like the hingy-lids wold leave some sort of braketry behind after the lid is removed - ruining the look regardless...? [/quote
    Posted to BeoWorld North America (Forum) by Peter on 04-08-2011
  • Re: Beogram comparison

    The lid on the 2000 simply slides off so if you want no lid, no problem. Once you have used a record player for a while, you will want the lifting lid!!
    Posted to BeoWorld North America (Forum) by Peter on 04-07-2011
  • Re: Beogram Thorens ready to fill my days with music.

    I thought you might have issues when I saw it on the table - mine is wall mounted and this made a big difference to vibration sensitivity - the bass seemed better which I imagine was down to increased isolation.
    Posted to Vintage Products (Forum) by Peter on 04-07-2011
  • Re: Beosound 5 Encore

    That is why it is called the Encore - it is not just a BS5 head unit - you will note it is slightly thicker! The operating software is in the BS5 Encore. It does lose some features of the normal BS5/BM5 but obviously gains as well.
    Posted to BeoSound 5 Forum (Forum) by Peter on 04-07-2011
  • Re: old man!

    Will this still work though? I don't see how you can convert modern signal to the original signal required for this age of set. The observant at Walthamstow surely has a point - I am sure it works electrically but could you actually use it - I would suggest that this is actually slightly academic as it is clearly a museum piece.
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by Peter on 04-07-2011
  • Re: Beogram comparison

    Have a look at the 2000 - the lid hinges - much more practical!
    Posted to BeoWorld North America (Forum) by Peter on 04-07-2011
  • Re: Beogram comparison

    I think you are very wise! The MMC20 range do seem a little more sturdy than the MMC1-5 range but one only needs to look at Soundproof's story of the supporting plastic breaking to realise that removing cartridges should be done as little as possible!
    Posted to BeoWorld North America (Forum) by Peter on 04-06-2011
Page 37 of 777 (7761 items) « First ... < Previous 35 36 37 38 39 Next > ... Last »