|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
STRUER (Mutton Financial) - Bang & Olufsen AS said its chief research scientist: Dr. Moreau has been released from his responsibilities with immediate effect. Apparently he was inverse engineering ACL technology and adapting it for use in an upcoming new product: Beomic 9 Reports stated that something bhaad happened in the lab and several of his
-
good grief... i have piles of boxes i haven't even opened up yet, but would love a bm8000!
-
darioazul: Dear Sheeps: What's your favorite B&O kit, be older or newer?. Welcome & keep on grassin' Dario don't know about their favorite, but i could take a guess at their least favorite...
-
hi all, little different post here... as a budding hobbyist, i am looking at improving my bench test/repair tools. i am considering the purchase of my first oscilloscope. so... what do you feel are the "must haves?" / the "that would be nice?" / and the "oooh, someday!" brands / models / prices / tips? thx in advance for
-
assuming you are using a dvd1... while you will get output using the rca connections, you will not have any control w/o using the scart connection. all remote functions are passed thru the mx via scart to the dvd player. hope that helps,
-
you know what, while i would def re-foam the cx's and save them... have you considered looking for an older larger pair of passives? perhaps s45/s55/s60 etc...? the early s45's really are fantastic sounding speakers and can usually be found for not a great deal more than the re-foam kit and your time to install. btw, i run s60's w/ my 9300
-
agreed, i believe all of the mounts are unique relative to their axis orientation...
-
pig's ear? i was trying to help... seem to recall my initial post coming at the end of... " Unfortunately, you're at a bit of a dead end with this one." and... "So the answer then it seems is to bang the phone hard on a table until it doesn't work. Perfect." well... i have used my "frankenstein" approach rather
-
Jandyt: That won't be much use to him Jeff, if he wants to re anodise. He wont be able to submerge it with all it's innards still in. correct... you could not re-anodise using this process. -as you are not removing any components -just masking them off. as far as my last comment -i was leaning more towards a lacquer or similar finish. just remember
-
thought some of *you* might find this interesting... LINK
|
|
|