[quote user="TripEnglish"]Sonos is streaming from iTunes. It does not have any internal memory of its own.[/quote] Trip, don't speak about Sonos if you don't understand it : Sonos IS decoding Music. I think you where thinking about the Apple Airport express... Sonos can work without any computer running : the ZonePlayer finds a NAS

Ok, you saw the "little detail in the background" : they are not TOTALLY average, they are french Sorry, I need to go, I have to charge my light-suit before going out in a bar in Paris tonight

Here we are : two average B&O customers watching a movie on their BV4-85, with Tomaz-Beoview-glasses ;-)

Woaw Tomaz, your new design is a good mix between TRON and B&O But you've forgot one thing : B&O customers spends FORTUNES on speakers, so they don't want headphones !

@macjonny : I was talking about 3D technology, not screen technology, so saying that LG passive sets are not good because they are edge-lit panels doesn't makes any sense : passive tech is more expensive, so for a "normal" price they can't sell both full LED and passive 3D (they are LG, not B&O!)... But B&O could have done

You're not alone... The fact is that the interest of customers for 3D TVs has been far lower than expected this year. People just don't want to use glasses (mainly those horrible active shutter glasses, there is a far better customer satisfaction with passive polarized glasses), they don't want to pay that much for glasses, and... They want

Yes, that's true : the industry is moving to passive glasses... So will be B&O... In less than 10 years!

The 3D glasses are ugly, big, heavy and boring : a standard chinese design... Loewe has gone the same way with its 3D glasses. It seems that high end manufacturers don't have enough money to make cool 3D glasses. Actually, the best active 3D glasses I've tried are the new bluetooth from Samsung : very light, and as the batteries are behing the

As the systems that can read Apple Lossless are created by reverse-engineering and no full specification from Apple, I would not be totally satisfied with such a solution : what proves that I get the best possible quality out of my lossless track? I prefer to have a FLAC track that is decoded by a documented process and not a trick. The company to blame

You can use one BM5, or one NAS with your music collection in it, and multiple Beosound 5 Encore. Everything connected via ethernet cabling. That would be a good solution I think, but we still have to see what such a system can do (Beonet)