congrats niko! very nice! looks like teak in the pics... is it? don't forget to add a bc900 also! how about a nice pair of beovox____ period speakers rather than cx50?

looks like a floor stand w/ a BL10...

i have a 3x2...

with the tv on, use the STAND + << >> to move it to the viewing position desired, press STORE twice... EDIT... scratch that! i see you already tried! hate to keep guessing, i will have access to try later tonight, but... have you tried the move, then pressed GO i am sure i have done this w/ a beo4???

[quote user="soundproof"]Does the Beogram 6000 make sense with the Beomaster 4400?[/quote] i was thinking the same thing, but perhaps there was a deal to be made at the time on a 6000??? whitefang could have had any of the tables from that "family" 400x - 6000... the mystery continues!

tom, welcome to beoworld! chk to see if you can add STAND to your beo4. then use << and/or >>.

[quote user="Stonk"] I would think that to remember the controls would be much clearer than the size of the unit. [/quote] that is going on my tombstone.

tan vs. rad would certainly settle it, though those tabs were certainly 400x-6000 territory, and i agree that none were exactly narrow... this is rather fun! it reminds of the old "photo quiz" thread -would love to see the crew put another quiz together!

[quote user="burantek"] [quote user="whitefang"]and was controlled by flexible brushed stainless tabs located in the front right corner.[/quote] again, all data appears valid. as a betting man, you had a 6000 , not 6006. [/quote] my deduction was based on his "flexible brushed stainless tabs"

hi, welcome to beoworld! [quote user="whitefang"]I had the Beomaster 4500, which appears in this site as the 4400, with man. dates of 1981-86. I bought it in 1980, and the model was first seen by me in a magazine article around 1977[/quote] wow, that was confusing! (4400 from 81-86?) beoworld data appears valid (77-80), you had a 4400. [quote