|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
I suspect this should be obvious from previous threads, but not being very tech savvy can I have your advice. I have a B&O set up - BV3/DVD1/V8000, BL9 front, BL3 rear and BL2. At some point I'd like to change the TV for an LCD or plasma, as the BV3 is just too big for the space it sits in in my new house but I cannot go to the price of a new
-
Many thanks - I've asked my dealer, and a guy who does install and they both mentioned topfield, so will go with that, and get a new STB software chip into the BV3, many thanks!
-
I have recently moved to a new flat and taken my BV3 and Sky+ box (connected by STB). The new flat is in a block with a communal Sky dish, but only one Sky socket in each flat. Without being connected to two sockets, the recording is a bit hit and miss (and can't record and watch another prog) at same time. Recording when TV is not actually switched
-
I also sometimes get interference - best to get the PSTN as far away from other wires eg broadband etc - but I guess is a problem in most homes today that are heavily wired
-
I wonder why 16:9 rather than 1.61803399:1 was decided as most comfortable http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
-
Some really thought provoking threads here. To clarify my point about the cost of B&O - for me I do not have a problem in spending £7k on a B&O TV - I already have spent not far off that when I bought my BV3 with all the bells and whistles. I also don't have a problem with B&O pricing their BV7 at the same level - as long as I'm
-
I look over the number of postings about BV7 MkI vs Mk II and MkIII and whether a MkIV is coming out - plus whether HDMI ready or full HDMI, 780p, 1080i etc etc and really wonder if I'll get on the LCD/plasm bandwagon. I have a BV3 that seems to have a better picture than any TV (flat or other) of anyone I know. I have been toying (probably when
-
I personally never got on with a Com4. I used to got awful interference. I was told it was likely down to having wireless broadband. Huh? Isn't that rather common to have now? Anyway, I changed to Com6000s - maybe its the different phone thing that the phones all connect to, but the 6000s are fine. So I'm not such a com4 fan
-
I assume the G in his name stands for Glaxo.... Given he therefore has net assets of around $50billion I'm sure there's no problem - NOT!!
-
If you want something that gets your music and photos on your tv with zero hassle (especially if you are a mac user I suspect) the I think aTV is a winner. It doesn't have the functionality that doing this through a mac mini will give, but that depends on how long you want to spend doing this, your technical ability in this area and getting it to
|
|
|