i read this article old but interesting long one though http://www.roymorgan.com/resources/pdf/papers/20051103.pdf

would you buy it again for the same price???,personally i did not think was good enough tv to warrant the B&O badge !!!

beauty!!

Got to be Black Magic Woman by Santana

Peter : I have no problems with debate - even heated ones, but I don't regard personal attack as debate. 355F is a well respected member of this forum and his reputation was called into question - I regard that as unpleasant. Personally, I think he deserves an apology. He is well known to both Lee and myself and has been very helpful to the forum

moxxey: Peter : Goodness - what an unpleasant thread It's not that unpleasant Peter. Just a debate :) Yes, I can imagine the BV9 is stunning. The problem is, it's nearly twice the price of the BV7-40. i agree with moxxey it is a debate ,NO way i will fall for b&o sets again!! once bitten??!!,i am saving for new merc e-class(new shape) next

TripEnglish: The new CEO signs on this summer, so it would seem that if his initial actions are received favorably, the stock would rise. he will have to be a magician!!! need to pull a rabbit out of the hat !!! time will tell!!??

having owned the avant i purchased bv7-32 i was totally disheartened with it ,for variety of reasons including picture was not b&o usual standard i decided to sell it quick which i did! however i would not rush back and buy another b&o tv ,there is one on sale gumtree (hoax may be for that price),but personally i do not even think it is worth

i went to my local currys store & seen the new panasonic free sat tv was wow wow very nice &excellent value compared to b&o ,i am seriously thinking buying one soon , impressed with it!!!!

nothing new here b&o do not embrace technology only money