I thought there was a difference. Edges seemed better defined, but with less ghosting, but I couldn't really judge much else because of where it was positioned. Connection wise, it's a bit of a step ahead of the old one. More connections than the Italian mafia, but it looks like they've really thought about where each socket goes. No differences in

The speed gains are much larger on Intel machines, but the PowerPCs will also see a speed increase, as normal with newer versions of OS X. I've been using a beta version of an external HDD on my MBP, and it's very good. I have two gripes though: They've replaced the arrows under dock icons with horrible little glowing lights, which I just don't like

BeoLab 4000s, 8000s and 3s are your options IMO! You could maybe even push for BeoLab 9s, if you have the cash/the girlfriend agrees. All sound pretty different, so you should always listen to the speakers properly before buying them. As much as I love my new BeoLab 4s, I can't recommend them as an alternative to BeoLab 5000s! The 4000s are a much more

Oh it definitely adds depth and meat to the sound, but in comparison to other subs on the market it can be really distracting when it comes to music. I suggest you have a listen to a B&W PV1 to see what a really musical sub can sound like...

I take it you haven't used one then! Having used both an iPhone and iPod touch, I see exactly why it costs what it does, and actually seems rather cheap when you see how good it is when it comes to browsing the net, flicking through your favourite albums or viewing photos. I tend to use my Nano for listening to music now instead of my 80gb fifth gen

Christian: 1. Beovision 600 in white. I've got one of them! For me personally: BeoCenter 6 BeoVision 7 with BeoLab 7-4 Avant BeoVision 9 MX 4000/4200 BeoVision 5 BeoVision/Center 1 BeoVision 8 BeoVision 6 (the Center just has so much more class to me) BeoVision 3 BeoVision 4 (the most boring B&O telly design ever IMO, but there isn't exactly all that

I believe the 'slowness' of the BeoLab 2 may be attributed to the tuning of the passive radiators. The lower you tune a diaphragm (whether it's an active cone or passive cone), the slower it responds as it's resonant frequency is lower. Think of it like trying to swing a heavily weighted pendulum around in tight circles, in comparison to a lighter weighted

jazz: for you to state 70hz at -8db you must have seen a freq response graph.. where did you see this, and have you seen it for the other speakers and where can i get my hands on such information. jazz When specs for speakers are written down, they give an indication of this through the +/- figure at the end of the frequency response. For example, 50

Yes, but Apple are also releasing it for Tiger and Windows XP/Vista. You can download it from their site at the moment, but bear in mind it's a Beta...

Of course, mybad.